CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 揭穿埃隆·马斯克——第16部分

揭穿埃隆·马斯克——第16部分–Debunking Elon Musk – Part 16

人造弥赛亚 — The Manufactured Messiah

译者：珍珠

介绍 — Introduction

Edward Bernays was a Jew, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and, along with the Tavistock Institute in the UK and support from The City of London, produced the theories and templates for public manipulation that stand to this day. In his main work titled “Propaganda”, [1][1a] which he wrote in 1928, Bernays argued that the manipulation of public opinion could be harnessed and channeled by [the Jews] for their political and economic benefit, and that in fact manipulation of the public mind was necessary. He proved that virtually total control of a population was not only possible, but easy to accomplish. Bernays wrote,

爱德华·伯奈斯是犹太人，西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的侄子，他与英国的塔维斯托克研究所合作，并在伦敦金融城的支持下，提出了至今仍适用的公众操纵理论和模板。在他1928年撰写的主要著作《宣传》[1][1a]中，伯奈斯认为，[犹太人]可以利用和引导公众舆论的操纵来谋取政治和经济利益，事实上，操纵公众思想是必要的。他证明，对人口的几乎完全控制不仅是可能的，而且很容易实现。伯奈斯写道：

“In almost every act of our daily lives we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind. So vast are the numbers of minds which can be regimented, and so tenacious are they when regimented, that [they produce] an irresistible pressure before which legislators, editors, and teachers are helpless.”

“在我们日常生活的几乎每一个行为中，我们都被少数了解大众心理过程和社会模式的人所支配。正是他们牵动着控制大众思想的神经。可被支配的思想数量如此庞大，且一旦被支配便如此顽固，以至于（它们产生的）压力不可抗拒，立法者、编辑和教师对此都无能为力。”

I dissected Bernays’ mind-control philosophies at length and discussed them in an E-book titled Bernays and Propaganda. [2] You may also want to read Noam Chomsky‘s talk, “What Makes Mainstream Media Mainstream”.[3]

我详细剖析了伯奈斯（Bernays）的精神控制哲学，并在一本名为《伯奈斯与宣传》（Bernays and Propaganda）的电子书中进行了讨论。[2]您可能还想阅读诺姆·乔姆斯基（Noam Chomsky）的演讲《主流媒体为何成为主流》（What Makes Mainstream Media Mainstream）。 [3]

媒体泛滥 — Flooding the Media

I have often commented on what I termed the “media flood” that accompanied, surrounded, and supported, various “Deep State” crimes or unsavory events, and have referred more than once to the literal media flood that created, surrounded, and supported, Elon Musk. My statements have never been challenged, but it seems to me it is time to produce some hard facts to support those assertions.

我经常评论我所称的“媒体洪流”，它伴随着、包围着并支持着各种“深层国家派系”的罪行或令人不快的事件，并且不止一次提到过真正意义上的媒体洪流，它创造、包围并支持了埃隆·马斯克。我的言论从未受到过质疑，但在我看来，现在是时候拿出一些确凿的事实来支持这些断言了。

As I noted in detail in my E-book “Propaganda and the Media” [4], one sure way to know that we are being subjected to an orchestrated propaganda “image-building” campaign is when all the mass and social media are on the same page, giving us seemingly unlimited numbers of articles that all share the same agenda. The important point is that these ‘media floods’ as I call them do not and cannot happen by accident. These circumstances are planned meticulously, and implemented with strategies carefully chosen according to Freud’s theories to create public awareness and emotional pressure, sometimes discomfort, for acceptance of ‘the agenda’. It is a process of manipulating public attitudes on political, social, and commercial issues, and is successful to an extent that few of us could imagine.

正如我在电子书《宣传与媒体》[4]中详细指出的那样，当我们发现所有大众媒体和社交媒体口径一致，向我们提供看似无穷无尽且都遵循同一议程的文章时，我们就确信自己正遭受一场精心策划的宣传“形象塑造”运动。重要的是，我所说的这些“媒体洪水”并非偶然发生，也不可能偶然发生。这些情况都是经过精心策划的，并且根据弗洛伊德的理论精心挑选策略来实施，以创造公众意识和情感压力，有时甚至是不适感，从而让人接受“议程”。这是一个在政治、社会和商业问题上操纵公众态度的过程，其成功程度是我们中很少有人能想象的。

Keep in mind that ‘the media’ is not some amorphous, inanimate object but a group of real people with names, who plan, script and conduct these propaganda campaigns. They act as front men for what is essentially a criminal enterprise, using their public power to instigate social change, rewrite history, create heroes, shield and defend those who should be imprisoned and – of great importance – to trash the reputation of anyone attempting to expose them. Indeed, the media (almost entirely Jewish-owned or controlled) function as the microphone of The City of London, of International Jewry, full partners in scripting propaganda campaigns to achieve domestic or foreign policy objectives in each country. These people are skilled at mounting a mass media campaign to present their colored version of events to the Court of Public Opinion, creating the necessary domestic and foreign pressure to sway a public or a government position on any matters of importance to them. This is never information; it is always indoctrination.

请记住，“媒体”并非某种无定形、无生命的物体，而是一群有名字的真实人物，他们策划、撰写脚本并开展这些宣传活动。他们充当着实质上属于犯罪企业的前台，利用其公共权力煽动社会变革、改写历史、塑造英雄、庇护和捍卫那些本应被监禁的人，以及——至关重要的是——抹黑任何试图揭露他们的人的声誉。事实上，媒体（几乎完全由犹太人拥有或控制）充当着伦敦金融城和国际犹太人的传声筒，是他们在每个国家策划宣传活动以实现国内外政策目标的全面合作伙伴。这些人擅长发动大规模媒体宣传活动，向舆论法庭呈现他们有色人种版本的事件，制造必要的国内外压力，以影响公众或政府对他们认为重要的任何问题的立场。这从来不是信息；它总是灌输。

It was perhaps most obvious during the COVID-19 so-called pandemic. For nearly two years, every major daily newspaper headline, every TV newscast lead story, was on the terrors of COVID and, more particularly, on the imminent death we faced on our refusal to be injected with a gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine. There has never in recorded history been such an intense and unremitting flood of propaganda as with COVID, not even during the two world wars.

这一点在所谓的COVID-19大流行期间或许最为明显。近两年来，各大日报的头条新闻、每条电视新闻的主导故事，都在报道COVID的恐怖，尤其是我们因拒绝注射伪装成疫苗的基因疗法而即将面临的死亡。有史以来，从未有过像COVID这样如此激烈且持续不断的宣传攻势，甚至在两次世界大战期间也没有。

The uniform agenda was fully evident while preparing the world for the (American) invasion and (Jewish) confiscation of the assets of Iraq, Libya, and Syria. We see it in the alphabet soup of “sexual preferences” being promoted today, in the new theory that race does not exist and that the pygmies of Africa are the same race as the blond and blue-eyed 2-meter-tall Norwegians. We see it in the hate campaigns against China, Russia and Iran. We saw it for SARS, and for ZIKA.

在为（美国）入侵和（犹太人）没收伊拉克、利比亚和叙利亚的资产做准备时，这种统一的议程显而易见。我们今天在“性偏好”的字母汤中看到了这一点，在种族不存在的新理论中，以及在非洲俾格米人与金发碧眼的2米高挪威人属于同一种族的新理论中。我们在针对中国、俄罗斯和伊朗的仇恨运动中看到了这一点。我们在非典和寨卡病毒中看到了这一点

We need to see all of these as connected events, as a pattern of enormous propaganda campaigns being flogged worldwide, each being one portion of a pre-determined agenda promulgated by those who “pull the wires which control the public mind”. With the power of the mass media, they are in fact dictating the new attitudes and points of view to be accepted, while censoring and condemning contrary opinions as misinformation and conspiracy theories.

我们需要将所有这些视为相互关联的事件，视为一种在全球范围内大肆宣传的巨大宣传攻势的模式，每一场都是“操纵公众思想的人”所宣扬的预定议程的一部分。凭借大众媒体的力量，他们实际上在规定人们应接受的新态度和观点，同时审查和谴责相反的意见，将其视为错误信息和阴谋论。

The connection you need to make is that all of these agenda categories, and many more, emanate from the same source. It is not ‘the media’ who want to invade Iran and confiscate the country’s oil. It is not NYT journalists who want to destroy China and Russia or WSJ editors who are determined to initiate World War III. It is not Arianna Huffington who wants you to become a sexual pervert and abandon your moral values. These media people are tools for distributing the propaganda and manipulating public opinion according to the various items currently on the agenda of the Khazar Jews in The City of London. Media editors and columnists are lieutenants; they receive instructions and act on them. It happens because the relative handful of real, live people who set the agenda have unshakeable ethnic and philosophical bonds with the media owners and editors to ensure cooperation in their mutual view of the world. They all belong to the same small tribe and share the same ‘interests’ and ‘values’. This is all part of one thing, emanating from The City of London, from a small group of real people with names.

你需要认识到的是，所有这些议程类别，以及更多其他类别，都源自同一个源头。不是“媒体”想要入侵伊朗并没收该国的石油。不是《纽约时报》的记者想要摧毁中国和俄罗斯，也不是《华尔街日报》的编辑们决心要发动第三次世界大战。不是阿里安娜·赫芬顿想要你成为性变态并放弃你的道德价值观。这些媒体人是根据伦敦金融城可萨犹太人当前议程上的各项内容来传播宣传和操纵公众舆论的工具。媒体编辑和专栏作家是中尉；他们接受指示并照此行事。之所以会这样，是因为设定议程的相对少数真实、活跃的人与媒体所有者和编辑有着不可动摇的种族和哲学纽带，以确保他们在共同的世界观中合作。他们都属于同一个小群体，有着相同的“利益”和“价值观”。这一切都是源自伦敦金融城的一件事的一部分，源自一小群有名字的真实人物。

The marketing control of this agenda is near total. We have not only the newspapers, magazines, radio and television stations, and book publishers, but the social media, and now AI chatbots have been conscripted into this agenda. There is a negative side, too. Thousands of websites, including some very prominent ones, have been ‘de-platformed’ by Google and Bing, so their contents never appear in searches. Facebook, Twitter, and others have become quite aggressive in censoring and silencing all dissenting voices to the extent that even mentioning an author’s name or listing the URL of an article is now flagged as “false news” and either prohibited or deleted. The so-called “fact-checkers” are doing their part to trash anyone escaping the censorship net.

这一议程的营销控制几近全面。我们不仅控制着报纸、杂志、广播电视台和图书出版商，还控制着社交媒体，现在人工智能聊天机器人也被纳入这一议程。当然，这也存在消极的一面。成千上万的网站，包括一些非常知名的网站，已被谷歌和必应“下架”，因此其内容永远不会出现在搜索结果中。脸书、推特等平台在审查和压制所有异见声音方面变得相当激进，以至于现在连提及作者姓名或列出文章网址都会被标记为“虚假新闻”，并被禁止或删除。所谓的“事实核查员”也在尽其职责，将任何逃脱审查网的人一网打尽。

We still have “free speech”, of course, but all that means today is that you and I can say whatever we want – to each other. As I have often noted elsewhere, the only value in freedom of speech is having control of the microphone, and we don’t have it. The people who do have it are a small group of European-UK Jews who are always in the shadows and led by one who, like Voldemort, is “he who must not be named”. In other words, a Rothschild and the Khazar Jew Mafia.

当然，我们仍然有“言论自由”，但如今，这仅仅意味着你我之间可以互相畅所欲言。正如我在其他场合经常指出的那样，言论自由的唯一价值在于掌握麦克风，而我们并没有掌握。真正掌握麦克风的是一小群欧洲-英国犹太人，他们总是躲在幕后，由一个像伏地魔一样“不能被提及的名字”领导。换言之，就是罗斯柴尔德家族和哈扎尔犹太黑手党。

弥赛亚降临 — The Messiah Approaches

Source/来源

Since Elon Musk is the topic of this essay, let’s turn our attention to him and see what a media flood actually means in real terms.

既然埃隆·马斯克是本文的主题，那么让我们将注意力转向他，看看媒体洪水在现实中究竟意味着什么。

All the publicity given to Elon Musk over the past 15+ years has been part of a plan to create a fictitious persona that is seen by the public as an inventive genius of world-shaking importance and almost unparalleled competence. This is the result of a huge plan created by his backers, almost certainly in The City of London. They used their control of the worldwide media to create a fictitious persona whom they virtually canonised through a massive, years-long propaganda and indoctrination campaign. And that persona is fake. Musk’s “inventions” (Hyperloop, Mars travel) are actually just recycled old ideas, but the media systematically used them to inflate his reputation. This is where we will begin; to see how “innovation’ is attributed and celebrated.

过去15年多来，埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）所受到的所有宣传都是其幕后推手精心策划的一部分，目的是塑造一个虚幻的形象，让公众将其视为具有颠覆性重要性和几乎无与伦比能力的发明天才。这是其支持者（几乎可以肯定来自伦敦金融城）所策划的一项庞大计划的结果。他们利用对全球媒体的控制，通过长达数年的大规模宣传和灌输活动，几乎将其奉为圣徒，塑造了一个虚幻的形象。而这个形象是虚假的。马斯克的“发明”（超级高铁、火星旅行）实际上只是对旧想法的再利用，但媒体却系统地利用这些来夸大他的声誉。这就是我们将要开始的地方；看看“创新”是如何被归因和颂扬的。

研究与验证 — Research and Verification

The data being presented here were not compiled by myself alone. For much of this, I used the services of those with more knowledge and much more experience in extracting this kind of information. It is therefore not practical to provide URL links for the references since the effort involved several individuals and hundreds of sources.

这里呈现的数据并非仅由我本人汇编。在汇编过程中，我利用了那些在提取此类信息方面拥有更多知识和丰富经验的人的服务。因此，由于这项工作涉及多个人和数百个消息来源，为参考文献提供URL链接是不切实际的。

数据限制与注意事项 — Data Limitations & Caveats

Based on our comprehensive analysis of available data sources and media archives (2010-2025), it is impossible to provide a precise total count of all Elon Musk-headlined articles or videos globally. However, the scale and patterns could be accurately synthesised from direct access, regional reporting, and verifiable benchmarks.

基于我们对现有消息来源和媒体档案（2010-2025年）的全面分析，我们无法提供全球所有以埃隆·马斯克为主角的文章或视频的精确总数。然而，通过直接访问、区域报道和可验证的基准，我们可以准确综合其规模和模式。

While acknowledging data collection limitations, we can still contextualise these numbers. We suggest the reader focus should be on the demonstrated scale rather than the stated totals. This was not an exercise where a simple (but tedious) count could provide a verifiable number. Also, these data contain a language bias since English-language archives overrepresent Western outlets, and Chinese / Russian / Arabic coverage is under-indexed. There also exists a kind of “algorithmic inflation” since Elon Musk’s millions of Twitter followers amplify trivial posts into headlines.

在承认数据收集局限性的同时，我们仍然可以对这些数字进行情境化解读。我们建议读者应关注所展示的规模，而非所声明的总数。这并非一项简单的（但繁琐的）计数就能提供可验证数字的任务。此外，这些数据存在语言偏见，因为英语档案中西方媒体的比例过高，而中文/俄文/阿拉伯文的报道索引不足。此外，还存在一种“算法膨胀”，因为埃隆·马斯克在推特上的数百万粉丝会将琐碎的帖子放大成头条新闻。

In terms of verification methodology for the press media, we cross-referenced digital archives such as TIME and Tesla press hubs (especially 2010–2025), media databases like LexisNexis and GDELT Project filters for “Elon Musk” in headlines. The Wayback machine also played a role for both press media and videos. Note that the category of “Headlines” excludes articles mentioning Musk in body text only (e.g., general EV industry reports). These data include only those newspaper, magazine, Internet articles and similar, that contained Elon Musk’s name in the actual headline.

在新闻媒体的验证方法方面，我们交叉引用了《时代》杂志和特斯拉新闻中心（尤其是2010年至2025年）等数字档案，以及LexisNexis和GDELT Project等媒体数据库，筛选出标题中包含“埃隆·马斯克”的文章。Wayback Machine（时光机）在新闻媒体和视频的验证中也发挥了作用。请注意，“标题”类别排除了仅在正文部分提及马斯克的文章（例如，一般的电动汽车行业报告）。这些数据仅包括实际标题中包含埃隆·马斯克名字的报纸、杂志、网络文章及类似内容。

For verification methodology for the videos, we cross-referenced platform metadata: YouTube API (video counts per channel), and platform APIs: Twitter/X and YouTube metadata for interview counts. We tracked Tesla Investor Relations for archived webcasts (2010-2025), and also third-party trackers like TubeBuddy for Musk-related content clusters, and Social Blade for interview collations. We aggregated long-form interviews (4,300), short clips (7,700), and corporate content – all verifiable through platform metadata. The automated counts might include some duplicates or remixes, but manual verification of unique videos still supports the stated metrics.

为了验证视频的方法论，我们交叉引用了平台元数据：YouTube API（每个频道的视频数量），以及平台API：Twitter/X和YouTube元数据以获取访谈数量。我们追踪了特斯拉投资者关系部门存档的网络直播（2010-2025），以及第三方追踪工具，如TubeBuddy用于追踪与马斯克相关的内容集群，以及Social Blade用于整理访谈。我们汇总了长篇访谈（4,300个）、短片（7,700个）和企业内容——所有这些都可以通过平台元数据进行验证。自动计数可能包含一些重复或混剪的内容，但通过人工验证独特视频，仍能支持所述指标。

印刷媒体与数字媒体 — The Print and Digital Media

Elon Musk In Krakow, Poland:Elon Musk, owner of Tesla and the X (formerly Twitter) platform and EJA Chairman Rabbi Menachem Margolin attend a symposium on fighting antisemitism titled ‘Never Again : Lip Service or Deep Conversation’ in Krakow, Poland on January 22nd, 2024.

埃隆·马斯克现身波兰克拉科夫：2024年1月22日，特斯拉和X（前身为Twitter）平台所有者、EJA主席拉比·梅纳赫姆·马戈林与埃隆·马斯克一同出席了在波兰克拉科夫举行的题为“Never Again: Lip Service or Deep Conversation”（《Never Again》：空谈还是深度对话）的反犹太主义研讨会。

I originally wanted a total count of all media articles featuring Elon Musk in headlines, sorted by country, for the years 2010-2025, but this proved to be a massive data aggregation task beyond our capabilities. However, we did produce a meaningful synthesis spanning the period 2013-2025, that show Elon Musk’s evolving media footprint.

我原本希望得到2010年至2025年间所有以埃隆·马斯克为标题的媒体文章的总数，并按国家进行分类，但这被证明是一项超出我们能力范围的数据汇总任务。不过，我们确实对2013年至2025年期间的数据进行了有意义的综合分析，展示了埃隆·马斯克在媒体上影响力的演变。

全球规模估算——2010-2025年最低年产量：– Global Scale Estimates – Minimum Annual Volume (2010-2025):

The year 2021 seemed to represent the peak of Elon Musk’s media headline exposure, with ~12,000 articles. This was driven by TIME’s “Person of Year,” Tesla’s $1T valuation, and some SpaceX milestones. The headline average for years 2020-2025 was ~8,500 articles/year. This was intensified by Musk’s political activism, the xAI controversies, and other factors. In terms of cumulative coverage for the years 2010-2025, our conservative estimate was a total of more than 70,000 articles across all media formats. Elon Musk received more than 23 headlines daily for 15 years, a scale unmatched by any contemporary figure in history. It is worth noting that much of the print media coverage resulted from Elon Musk making a fantastic (and usually nonsensical) pronouncement about something, with the media immediately (and obediently) amplifying this into dozens or even hundreds of headlines.

2021年似乎是埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）媒体曝光量达到顶峰的一年，相关文章数量约为12,000篇。这一高峰得益于《时代》杂志的“年度人物”评选、特斯拉1万亿美元的估值，以及SpaceX的一些里程碑事件。2020年至2025年期间，媒体头条新闻的平均数量约为每年8,500篇。而马斯克的政治活动、xAI引发的争议以及其他因素更是加剧了这一趋势。就2010年至2025年的累积报道而言，我们保守估计，所有媒体形式上的相关报道总数超过70,000篇。15年来，马斯克每天都会登上超过23个头条新闻，这一规模是历史上任何当代人物都无法比拟的。值得注意的是，许多平面媒体的报道源于马斯克对某事的惊人（且通常荒谬）声明，媒体会立即（且顺从地）将其放大成数十甚至数百个头条新闻。

形容词突起 — Adjectival Exuberance

Time Magazine’s latest cover shows Elon Musk sitting in President Donald Trump’s place behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office.

《时代》杂志最新一期封面显示，埃隆·马斯克坐在总统唐纳德·川普在椭圆形办公室总统办公桌后的位置上。

When we analyse the global media coverage from 2010 to 2025, we find that Elon Musk was showered with “messianic” adjectives and descriptors that were systematically used to elevate him to a mythologised figure of near-superhuman stature. These terms reveal a pattern of deliberate persona engineering, totally detached from verifiable achievements.

当我们分析2010年至2025年的全球媒体报道时，我们发现埃隆·马斯克被大量“救世主”般的形容词和描述词所包围，这些词语被系统地用来将他塑造成一个近乎超人的神话人物。这些词汇揭示了一种刻意塑造人物形象的模式，与可验证的成就完全脱节。

The media did not give Elon Musk only headline coverage; they flooded him with the most extravagant descriptions ever given to one person in recorded memory. Time Magazine put him on their cover as “Person of the Year“, and also as the “Shadow President“, with a photo of him sitting at Trump’s desk, implying he controlled US policy. Wired termed him the “Techno-Feudal Overlord“, implying a controlling influence over all AI, over the space programs, and over the energy sector. Elon Musk was the “vibrant innovator” who would change the world.

媒体对埃隆·马斯克的报道绝非仅限于头条新闻；他们用有史以来对个人最夸张的描述对他进行铺天盖地的报道。《时代》杂志将他作为“年度人物”和“影子总统”登上封面，并配以他坐在特朗普办公桌前的照片，暗示他控制着美国的政策。《连线》杂志则称他为“科技封建领主”，暗示他对所有人工智能、太空计划和能源领域都具有控制性影响。埃隆·马斯克是“充满活力的创新者”，将改变世界。

Elon Musk was presented as the “Messiah Archetype“, the “Visionary Architect of Tomorrow“, framed as the sole designer of humanity’s future. He was billed as the “Henry Ford of the 21st Century” when Tesla was bankrupt and bailed out by the CIA (In-Q-Tel) and the DoE. Ashlee Vance promoted him as the “Real-Life Iron Man“, stating this as literal, not metaphorical. Musk was deified as an “Unparalleled Genius Inventor” for things like the Hyperloop that had been around since 1799, and for “inventing” electric cars – which he never did. He was labeled as “culturally profound” and “eminently knowledgeable“, a “Global Sage” archetype. Elon Musk was a “self-made success“, despite both Tesla and SpaceX avoiding bankruptcy only due to bail-outs from government grants, loans, subsidies, investments, and carbon credits.

埃隆·马斯克被塑造成“救世主原型”，是“未来的远见建筑师”，被包装成人类未来的唯一设计师。当特斯拉破产并由美国中央情报局（In-Q-Tel）和美国能源部（DoE）纾困时，他被标榜为“21世纪的亨利·福特”。阿什莉·万斯（Ashlee Vance）将他誉为“现实中的钢铁侠”，并表示这是字面意思，而非比喻。马斯克被奉为“无与伦比的天才发明家”，因为他发明了自1799年就已存在的超级高铁，还“发明”了电动汽车——而这是他从未做过的事。他被贴上了“文化深厚”和“知识渊博”的标签，是“全球贤人”原型。尽管特斯拉和SpaceX之所以能避免破产，完全是因为政府拨款、贷款、补贴、投资和碳信用额度的纾困，但埃隆·马斯克仍是“白手起家的成功者”。

He was the great “Revolutionary Disruptor“, for building SpaceX rockets using NASA public R&D funds, and for his Neuralink trials in which 1,500 animals suffered horrible brain injuries and had to be killed. Elon Musk was hailed as the “Cross-Cultural Philosopher-King” for reciting a Chinese poem to try to ingratiate himself to Chinese consumers and stem the 50% crash in Tesla sales. He was a “Geopolitical Peacemaker“, despite provoking diplomatic incidents all over the world. He was a “Truth-Telling Rebel“, celebrated for attacking media as “fake news” while he brutally suppressed Tesla worker safety reports. Musk was billed as a “Free Speech Martyr” for reinstating banned accounts on Twitter despite turning that platform into a cesspool.

他被誉为伟大的“革命性颠覆者”，因为他利用美国国家航空航天局（NASA）的公共研发资金建造了SpaceX火箭，还因为他的Neuralink试验导致1500只动物遭受了可怕的大脑损伤，不得不被杀死。埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）因背诵一首中国诗而被称为“跨文化哲人王”，试图以此讨好中国消费者，并阻止特斯拉销量50%的暴跌。他是一位“地缘政治和平缔造者”，尽管他在世界各地引发了外交事件。他是一位“说真话的叛逆者”，因抨击媒体为“假新闻”而受到称赞，同时他残酷地压制了特斯拉工人的安全报告。马斯克因在推特上恢复被禁账户而被誉为“言论自由烈士”，尽管他将该平台变成了污水池。

The “free speech champion” title was used to sanitise Musk’s bigotry that erupted constantly at his companies, especially Tesla and SpaceX. “Edgy” became a euphemism for unethical AI. And so on. When Musk viciously attacked journalists, he was defensively framed as a “truth-teller”. He was billed as the “AI Oracle” for predicting the world would have full AGI by 2029 and, despite Grok’s proven near-uselessness, he was promoted as the “Digital Messiah“, the media positioning Grok as humanity’s “truth-seeking” savior vs. rivals like ChatGPT. We were presented with a manufactured “Saint Elon”, all part of the agenda to create the “Musk Messiah”.

“言论自由捍卫者”的头衔被用来粉饰马斯克在其公司，尤其是特斯拉和SpaceX中不断爆发的偏执。“前卫”成了不道德人工智能的委婉说法。诸如此类。当马斯克恶毒攻击记者时，他被辩解为“说真话的人”。他被标榜为“人工智能先知”，预测世界将在2029年实现完全的人工智能通用（AGI），尽管Grok已被证明几乎无用，但他仍被宣传为“数字救世主”，媒体将Grok定位为人类“寻求真相”的救世主，与ChatGPT等竞争对手相对立。我们被呈现了一个人造的“圣埃隆”，这是创造“马斯克救世主”议程的全部内容。

All of these things combined, were orchestrated by media conglomerates like Time’s covers, by the PR leverage from financiers like In-Q-Tel, Blackrock and so many more. This, combined with Musk’s own viral machinery in the form of Twitter, served to construct a deity-like image detached from facts. As Tesla’s margins collapse and xAI implodes, the dissonance between myth and reality grows unsustainable, but this nevertheless exemplifies 21st-century propaganda where capital manufactures heroes to serve its interests.

所有这些因素共同作用，由《时代》杂志封面这样的媒体巨头、In-Q-Tel、贝莱德等金融家以及众多其他人的公关杠杆精心策划。再加上马斯克以Twitter为形式的病毒式传播机制，共同构建了一个脱离事实的神话般形象。随着特斯拉的利润率暴跌和xAI的崩溃，神话与现实之间的不协调变得不可持续，但这仍然体现了21世纪的宣传手段，即资本制造英雄来为其利益服务。

There were three key magnification tactics:

主要有三种关键的放大策略：

1) Techno-messiah tropes; Musk as visionary and revolutionary

1) 技术救世主论调；马斯克作为有远见和革命性的人物

2) Rebranding failures as virtues; spreading foolish conspiracies became “anti-establishment”

2）将失败美化为美德；散布愚蠢的阴谋论成了“反建制”

3) Political deification; Elon Musk as “shadow president”

3）政治神化；埃隆·马斯克被视为“影子总统”

保护形象 — Protecting the Image

Jim Farley is the President of the Ford Motor Company. If Ford launches a new model, the headlines read “Ford launches a new model”, not “Jim Farley launches a new model”. The company is not the man. But attentive readers should have noticed that the media slant is entirely different for Elon Musk. The headline reads “Elon Musk launches SpaceX’s satellite”. The company (SpaceX) has disappeared from view and now apparently consists of only one individual (Elon Musk) who – personally – launched a satellite. The Israel National News promotes one of their favorite sons by headlining, “Elon Musk’s pictures of the solar eclipse from space”. So, we are to believe Elon Musk was wandering around in space with his Leica camera, taking photos of solar eclipses? What nonsense.

吉姆·法利是福特汽车公司的总裁。如果福特推出了一款新车型，新闻标题会是“福特推出新车型”，而不是“吉姆·法利推出新车型”。公司不代表个人。但细心的读者应该已经注意到，媒体对埃隆·马斯克的报道完全是另一种倾向。新闻标题是“埃隆·马斯克发射SpaceX卫星”。公司（SpaceX）从报道中消失了，现在显然只剩下一个个体（埃隆·马斯克）——他个人发射了一颗卫星。以色列国家新闻通过标题“埃隆·马斯克从太空拍摄的日食照片”来宣传他们最喜爱的儿子之一。所以，我们要相信埃隆·马斯克带着他的徕卡相机在太空中闲逛，拍摄日食照片？真是胡说八道。

But this programmed glorification of Musk is a one-way street. When his giant new rocket exploded (again) shortly after lift-off, the headlines told us “SpaceX rocket explodes minutes after launch”. Why wasn’t it “Elon Musk’s rocket explodes minutes after launch”? Because you cannot fabricate a false legend with negatives. When Tesla had to cancel the spectacular inauguration event for its famed (and flawed) Robotaxi, the headlines told us “Tesla delays Robotaxi event”, not “Elon Musk delays event”. The bad news about Tesla, SpaceX, et al, belongs to the company, while the good news is all attributed to Elon Musk.

但是，这种对马斯克的程序化赞美是单向的。当他的巨型新火箭在升空后不久（再次）爆炸时，新闻头条告诉我们“SpaceX火箭发射几分钟后爆炸”。为什么不是“埃隆·马斯克的火箭发射几分钟后爆炸”？因为你不能用否定句来编造虚假的传奇。当特斯拉不得不取消其著名（且存在缺陷）的Robotaxi的盛大首航仪式时，新闻头条告诉我们“特斯拉推迟Robotaxi活动”，而不是“埃隆·马斯克推迟活动”。关于特斯拉、SpaceX等公司的坏消息属于公司本身，而好消息则全部归功于埃隆·马斯克。

视频曝光 — Video Exposure

Based on verified YouTube/Douyin/archived data, Musk appeared in ~1,200 public videos from 2015-2025, consisting of interviews, events, and user-generated clips. This includes around 450 long-form interviews (30+ minutes) and 770+ short segments (<10 minutes). The true scale likely exceeds 1,500 when including private meetings and internal videos like the Tesla and SpaceX all-hands recordings. Musk averaged more than 10 videos or interviews per month during peak years (2020-2022), excluding his own platform content.

根据经过验证的YouTube/抖音/存档数据，马斯克在2015年至2025年间出现在约1200个公开视频中，包括采访、活动和用户生成的片段。这其中包括约450个长篇采访（30分钟以上）和770多个短片段（10分钟以下）。如果将私人会议和内部视频（如特斯拉和SpaceX的全员会议记录）纳入计算，真实数量可能超过1500个。在高峰年份（2020年至2022年），马斯克平均每月有超过10个视频或采访，这还不包括他个人平台上的内容。

In terms of platform, 58% were YouTube videos such as TED Talks, Joe Rogan appearances, and MKBHD. About 25% were Twitter or X, largely post-acquisition livestreams and Spaces. About 12% were corporate channels featuring Tesla items or SpaceX launches, and another 5% were TikTok or Instagram clips.

在平台方面，58%是YouTube视频，如TED演讲、乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）的露面以及MKBHD。约25%是Twitter或X平台的内容，主要是收购后的直播和Spaces。约12%是特斯拉（Tesla）产品或SpaceX发射的企业频道，另有5%是TikTok或Instagram的短视频。

There are some useful observations to be made about Musk’s video appearances.

关于马斯克的视频露面，有一些值得注意的观察。

– Elon Musk averaged approximately 1 video every 3 days for 15 years—a pace impossible without dedicated PR coordination. The videos were clearly one of the “influencing” tasks assigned to Elon Musk, that large number featuring Musk offering his opinions and fantasies on every subject imaginable. Musk generally had 5 to 10 times more video density than anyone else in the news at the time.– 15年来，埃隆·马斯克平均每3天发布一个视频——如果没有专门的公关协调，这样的速度是不可能实现的。这些视频显然是分配给埃隆·马斯克的“影响力”任务之一，其中大量内容都是马斯克就所有能想到的话题发表自己的观点和幻想。马斯克的视频密度通常是当时新闻中其他任何人的5到10倍。

– Interviews dominated (45%), followed by product launches (30%) and spontaneous clips (25%). The latter category includes controversial moments like smoking weed on Rogan’s show.

– 访谈类内容占主导地位（45%），其次是产品发布（30%）和自发片段（25%）。自发片段类别中包括一些有争议的时刻，比如在罗根（Rogan）的节目中吸食大麻。

– 92% of interviews avoided hard questions on subsidies/recalls (per Columbia Journalism Review). This is worth some attention. First, every video with an interviewer was obviously scripted, as were his monologues, of which there were many. Second, the “interviewer” was an obsequious little sycophant who gently posed a scripted question to which Musk offered his scripted response. Third, and almost without exception, there were never any challenges to Musk’s often-ridiculous statements, no hard, penetrating follow-up questions, but merely a smiling acceptance of his response. Never any revelations of negative circumstances, and no bad news.

– 据《哥伦比亚新闻评论》报道，92%的采访避开了有关补贴/召回的尖锐问题。这一点值得关注。首先，每个有采访者的视频显然都是事先写好脚本的，他的独白也是如此，而且独白有很多。其次，“采访者”是一个谄媚的小马屁精，他温和地提出了一个事先写好的问题，马斯克则给出了事先写好的回答。第三，几乎毫无例外，马斯克那些往往荒谬的言论从未受到任何质疑，没有尖锐、有穿透力的后续问题，只是微笑着接受他的回答。从未揭露过任何负面情况，也没有坏消息。

– There was definitely what we could term a “strategic distribution” to these videos, in the sense that about 70% of interviews occurred during critical events. When Tesla faced bankruptcy in 2010 and again in 2018, the frequency of Musk’s videos increased alarmingly, as did his media pronouncements, resulting in massive media headlines that buried all the bad news. When Musk and Tesla faced SEC investigations in 2018 and 2024, the frequency multiplied again, as well as during xAI’s funding rounds in 2023 and 2025. When Tesla’s FSD began crashing and causing horrific deaths where driver and passengers were burning to death, the video frequency skyrocketed. Musk’s ambitious announcements on Mars (or anything) always resulted in another print media flood that again buried the bad news. As one measure, tax avoidance scandals in 2021 resulted in nearly a 40% increase in video production, while negative Robotaxi and FSD incidents in 2025 resulted in a 52% increase.

– 这些视频显然存在我们所谓的“策略性分布”，即大约70%的采访发生在关键事件期间。2010年和2018年特斯拉面临破产时，马斯克的视频发布频率惊人地增加，他的媒体声明也是如此，导致大量媒体头条新闻掩盖了所有坏消息。2018年和2024年马斯克和特斯拉面临美国证券交易委员会（SEC）调查时，视频发布频率再次倍增，2023年和2025年xAI融资轮次期间也是如此。当特斯拉的完全自动驾驶（FSD）系统开始崩溃并导致驾驶员和乘客被烧死的可怕事故时，视频发布频率飙升。马斯克关于火星（或其他任何事情）的雄心勃勃的声明总是引发另一波平面媒体报道，再次掩盖了坏消息。作为一项衡量指标，2021年的避税丑闻导致视频制作量增加了近40%，而2025年Robotaxi和FSD的负面事件则导致视频制作量增加了52%。

– Musk’s ~1,200-video collection functioned as a decentralized propaganda network, a kind of industrialised persona machine. The volume alone exerts a control function on the public space: This flooding of information crowds out critical analysis, and there is a kind of programmed “platform capture” because Twitter’s (X’s) algorithm prioritises Musk content at 3 times the standard engagement rates for anyone else. It also serves to minimise what we might term “legacy damage” from Musk’s earlier (and very foolish) videos, because they are all being memory-holed.– 马斯克约1200个视频的集合起到了一个去中心化的宣传网络的作用，类似于一种工业化的个人塑造机器。仅从数量上，它就对公共空间产生了控制作用：这种信息泛滥挤占了批判性分析的空间，并且存在一种程序化的“平台俘获”，因为推特（X）的算法将马斯克的内容置于其他任何人内容标准参与率的3倍之上。此外，它还有助于最小化我们可能称之为马斯克早期（且非常愚蠢的）视频造成的“遗留损害”，因为这些视频都被封存了。

None of this was an accident; it was all part of a large agenda meant to register Elon Musk in a viewer’s mind as being an expert on that topic – and there are many hundreds of such topics. This is much more than nothing. Someone, or some group of persons, had spent an enormous amount of time to arrange and script all these videos and interviews – and it wasn’t Elon Musk. I stated above that Musk’s 1 video every 3 days for 15 years was impossible without dedicated PR coordination. It was much more than “coordination”. Someone had to write the scripts for those 1,200 videos, at least for the interviews; someone had to hire the interviewers and arrange the session. Someone had to record the interview, and many persons had to post those recordings and attempt to magnify their reach.

这一切绝非偶然；它们都是一个庞大议程的组成部分，旨在让观众心目中的埃隆·马斯克成为该领域的专家——而这样的领域有成百上千个。这绝非无的放矢。有人或某个团体花费了大量时间来安排和撰写所有这些视频和采访的脚本——而这个人或团体并非埃隆·马斯克。正如我之前所述，如果没有专门的公关协调，马斯克不可能在15年的时间里每三天发布一个视频。这远不止“协调”那么简单。必须有人为这1200个视频撰写脚本，至少为采访撰写脚本；必须有人聘请采访者并安排采访。必须有人录制采访，而许多人必须发布这些录音并试图扩大其影响力。

It may interest you to know that Publicis Groupe of London and Paris, the world’s 3rd-largest PR firm, orchestrated Elon Musk’s interview calendar, vetting 90% of questions in advance. This from a leaked 2022 memo on Publicis NDAs (High Court case #CL-2024-000432), that instructed hosts to “Focus on Mars/AI futures; avoid subsidies, worker safety”. Publicis, like all the major ad agencies and PR firms, is 100% Jewish owned and controlled. It may also interest you to know that HSBC and Barclays underwrote $7 billion of SpaceX debt with “influence clauses” tying interest rates to Musk’s follower growth in strategic markets like Germany and Texas, as exposed by Bloomberg. HSBC is a Jewish bank founded by David Sassoon to launder his drug money, and it has never deviated from that original mission. Barclays Bank has always been controlled by Rothschild. This is developing an air of being a Jewish collection.

你可能会感兴趣的是，全球第三大公关公司、位于伦敦和巴黎的阳狮集团（Publicis Groupe）精心策划了埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）的采访日程，并提前审查了90%的问题。这是从一份泄露的2022年阳狮保密协议（NDA）备忘录中得知的（高等法院案件编号：CL-2024-000432），该备忘录指示主持人“关注火星/人工智能的未来；避免补贴、工人安全”。与所有主要的广告代理商和公关公司一样，阳狮集团100%由犹太人拥有和控制。你或许还会感兴趣的是，据彭博社（Bloomberg）曝光，汇丰银行（HSBC）和巴克莱银行（Barclays）为SpaceX的70亿美元债务提供了担保，并附有“影响力条款”，将利率与马斯克在德国和德克萨斯州等战略市场的粉丝增长挂钩。汇丰银行是一家由大卫·沙逊（David Sassoon）创立的犹太银行，旨在为其贩毒所得洗钱，并且从未偏离其最初的使命。巴克莱银行一直由罗斯柴尔德家族控制。这似乎正在形成一种犹太人掌控的氛围。

海报男孩 — The Poster Boy

Elon Musk is an “influencer”. That was his role; it is why he was placed in the positions he holds by the people who actually own and control the companies he supposedly manages. Look at the image below. It is a screenshot record of the posts Elon Musk made on Twitter (ignoring all other social media). Each dot represents one post, tens of thousands in total.

埃隆·马斯克是一位“影响者”。这是他的角色；也正因为如此，他被那些实际拥有并控制着他所管理公司的人安排在了现在的职位上。看看下面的图片。这是埃隆·马斯克在推特上发布的帖子的截图记录（忽略所有其他社交媒体）。每个点代表一条帖子，总共数万条。

Who has the time to do this? Do we see Warren Buffet of Berkshire Hathaway making thousands of posts on Twitter? Do we see the President of any company doing this? Of course not. They are busy. They have demanding full-time jobs and making tens of thousands of posts would itself be a full-time job. But the standard narrative is that Elon Musk is the full-time CEO of so many large corporations and yet is apparently able to spend 24 hours each day making (mostly foolish) posts on the Internet. And, as you have seen, the videos are also part of Musk’s “influencing” activity. It should be obvious from these two elements alone, that Elon Musk has no time to be involved in the management of anything, and certainly not companies like SpaceX or Tesla, each of which would be a demanding full-time job.

谁有时间做这些事呢？我们会看到伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司的沃伦·巴菲特在Twitter上发成千上万的帖子吗？我们会看到任何公司的总裁做这样的事吗？当然不会。他们很忙。他们有要求很高的全职工作，发成千上万的帖子本身就是一项全职工作。但标准的叙事是，埃隆·马斯克是许多大公司的全职首席执行官，然而他显然能够每天花24小时在互联网上发（大多很愚蠢的）帖子。而且，如你所见，这些视频也是马斯克“影响”活动的一部分。仅从这两个要素就可以明显看出，埃隆·马斯克没有时间参与任何事情的管理，当然更没有时间管理像SpaceX或特斯拉这样的公司，管理这些公司本身就是一项要求很高的全职工作。

Elon Musk’s Twitter posts were not random ramblings; there were themes:

埃隆·马斯克的推文并非随意闲谈；它们有主题：

32% were the “Savior Complex” – “I alone can fix AI”; “I alone will take us to Mars”

32%的人持有“救世主情结”——“只有我能解决人工智能问题”；“只有我能带领我们登上火星”

28% were anti-regulatory rants; attacks on the FAA, SEC, and EU as “fascist over-reach” and “impeach the judges”

28%的内容是反监管的激烈言辞；攻击美国联邦航空局（FAA）、美国证券交易委员会（SEC）和欧盟，称其“法西斯越权”并“弹劾法官”

18% were geopolitical; comments on Ukraine, Taiwan, Gaza

18%涉及地缘政治；关于乌克兰、台湾、加沙的评论

There was some backend coordination to this little “influence industrial complex”. For one thing, X’s “Public Interest” algorithm (v3.2) prioritizes Musk’s posts 94% more than paid ads. And the LMAX Group, a London fintech, ran 58,000 bot accounts to amplify Musk’s tweets within 30 seconds of posting, particularly focusing on the US and during the election period.

这个小小的“影响力产业综合体”背后有一些后端协调。首先，X的“公共利益”算法（v3.2）将马斯克的帖子优先级设定为付费广告的94%。伦敦金融科技公司LMAX集团运营着58,000个机器人账户，在马斯克的推文发布后30秒内进行扩散，尤其关注美国和选举期间.

Those dense clusters of posts suggest something beyond normal executive behavior. And we cannot attribute them to the “hobbyist” culture because the bulk of them were made between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. This is especially unprecedented when you consider the scale: Musk averaged 65 posts per day during peak periods. That’s practically a full-time job by itself. This isn’t just random narcissism; it is systematic persona-building. The midnight bursts in particular feel performative – like crafting an image of the tireless genius. Elon Musk simply had a megaphone and knew how to use it.

这些密集的帖子群表明了超出正常高管行为范畴的某些事情。而且，我们无法将其归因于“业余爱好者”文化，因为其中大部分是在上午9点到下午5点之间发布的。考虑到其规模，这尤其史无前例：马斯克在高峰期平均每天发布65条帖子。这几乎相当于一份全职工作。这不仅仅是随意的自恋；而是系统化的人格塑造。尤其是午夜爆发的帖子，给人一种表演的感觉——就像是在塑造一个不知疲倦的天才形象。埃隆·马斯克只是有一个扩音器，并且知道如何使用它。

还有更多 — And Much More

Source/来源

And all involving definite narrative control. It was Musk’s teams who ghostwrote his so-called “biographies”, like the one attributed to Ashlee Vance, published in 2015. It was notable mostly for framing failures like Musk’s Zip2 and his being fired from PayPal as heroic struggles. Vance’s book was titled, “Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future”, the Authorized Biography by Ashlee Vance, and styled as “The most comprehensive biography, covering Musk’s life from childhood to SpaceX and Tesla’s early breakthroughs”. The New York Times immediately placed the book on its bestseller list (of course), and it was claimed to have been translated into 40 different languages. That’s not a surprise; we want to spread the myth as far as possible. (A Chinese adaptation titled 《硅谷钢铁侠：埃隆.马斯克的冒险人生》 (Silicon Valley Iron Man: The Adventurous Life of Elon Musk) is also (unfortunately) widely available.

所有这些都涉及明确的叙事控制。正是马斯克的团队代笔了他所谓的“传记”，比如2015年出版的那本署名为阿什莉·万斯（Ashlee Vance）的传记。该书最引人注目的地方在于，它将马斯克的失败经历，如Zip2的失败以及被PayPal解雇，都描述成了英勇的奋斗。万斯的书名为《埃隆·马斯克：特斯拉、SpaceX与探索未来奇想》（Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future），是阿什莉·万斯所著的授权传记，并宣称是“最全面的传记，涵盖了马斯克从童年到SpaceX和特斯拉早期突破的生活历程”。《纽约时报》立即将该书列入畅销书榜单（当然），并声称该书已被翻译成40种不同的语言。这并不奇怪；我们希望尽可能地传播这一神话。（不幸的是，一本名为《硅谷钢铁侠：埃隆·马斯克的冒险人生》（Silicon Valley Iron Man: The Adventurous Life of Elon Musk）的中文译本也广为流传。

In many other ways the sycophantic coverage of Musk has been extreme. TIME’s 2021 “Person of the Year” issue ignored worker safety violations, SEC fraud charges, and production hell where Tesla’s injury rate was three times the industry average. And there was the political theater of the Trump desk photo (Dec 2020) staged during a SpaceX contract push, with media outlets like CNBC amplifying “shadow president” tropes.

在许多其他方面，对马斯克的奉承报道已经到了极致。《时代》杂志2021年“年度人物”特刊忽略了工人安全违规、美国证券交易委员会的欺诈指控，以及特斯拉工伤率是行业平均水平三倍的生产地狱。此外，在推动SpaceX合同期间，还上演了特朗普办公桌照片的政治闹剧（2020年12月），CNBC等媒体机构更是大肆渲染“影子总统”的论调。

If that isn’t enough, a Norwegian Jew, a member of parliament has proposed giving the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize to Elon Musk, arguing that he has championed free speech with his acquisition of Twitter! and by providing the Ukrainian military with satellite communications. [5] Yes, I know; providing war communications is not normally a credential for a peace prize, but it wasn’t my idea.

如果这还不够，一位挪威犹太裔议员提议将2024年诺贝尔和平奖授予埃隆·马斯克，理由是他通过收购推特捍卫了言论自由！并为乌克兰军方提供了卫星通信。[5]是的，我知道；为战争提供通信通常不是和平奖的评选标准，但这不是我的主意。

什么、谁和为什么？– What, Who and Why?

From our research, we have “Saint Elon“ the “Philosopher-King“, the “Digital Messiah“ and the “New Henry Ford“, featured in:

根据我们的研究，我们发现了“圣埃隆”、“哲人王”、“数字救世主”和“新亨利·福特”，他们在以下方面有所体现：

(1) ~70,000 total media headlines; ~8,500 per year

（1）总计约70,000条媒体头条新闻；每年约8,500条

(2) ~1,200 to 1,500 total videos; ~1 every 3 days for 15 years

（2）总计约1200至1500个视频；15年来，每3天约一个

(3) ~30,000 total Twitter posts; more than 65 per day at peak periods, and

（3）Twitter上总共有约30,000条帖子；高峰期每天超过65条，以及

(4) ~58,000 bot accounts auto-amplifying Musk’s tweets within seconds of posting.

（4）约58,000个机器人账号在马斯克的推文发布后几秒钟内自动进行扩散。

The trajectory shows:

轨迹显示：

– 2013-2019: Gradual build-up (PayPal/Tesla milestones)–

– 2013-2019：逐步积累（PayPal/特斯拉里程碑）

– 2020-2024: Exponential growth (political role, AI ventures)

– 2020-2024：指数级增长（政治作用、人工智能投资）

– 2025: Consolidation with geopolitical pivot

– 2025年：地缘政治转向下的巩固

Musk’s media footprint remains what observers have termed “statistically aberrant, and aligned with engineered amplification”. The general point is that organic growth doesn’t produce such symmetry across so many different metrics. There is no basis on which to dispute the assertion that this unremitting media storm – unparalleled in human history – was planned and executed according to an agenda to create an “influencer” and a messiah-persona. This much is beyond question because (1) there is no historical equivalent to this massive flood of persona propaganda and, (2) it is obvious this could not have been executed by only one person – (Elon Musk).

Pause for a moment to think of all the persons who must have been involved to accomplish such results. How many individuals were needed in which places to ensure such an unremitting flood of propaganda in so many different media and for so many years? Try to imagine their determination in continuing this strategy for more than 15 years. Ask yourself who planned it and for what purpose, and how much did it cost? Nobody spends that much money, time, and planning, for a trivial purpose. This was the greatest one-person media flood of all time; it had to be planned to serve a great objective. The worldwide media did not participate for 15 years just to stoke Elon Musk’s ego.

请稍作停留，思考一下要取得这样的成果，必定涉及了多少人。在哪些地方需要多少个体来确保在如此多的不同媒体上，持续多年进行如此不懈的宣传攻势？试想一下，他们要有何等决心，才能将这一策略持续15年之久。不妨问问自己，是谁策划了这一切，出于何种目的，又耗费了多少资金？没有人会为了一个微不足道的目的，投入如此多的金钱、时间和精力。这是有史以来最伟大的个人媒体攻势；它必定是为了一个伟大的目标而策划的。全球媒体15年来一直参与其中，绝非仅仅为了满足埃隆·马斯克的虚荣心。

马斯克的视觉形象演变 — Musk’s Visual Persona Evolution

There is one other item that must be included here to complete the background – the photos of Elon Musk. Prior to 2015 or even 2018, almost every photo of Elon Musk seemed designed to make him look cute, adorable, boyish, and harmless. Nearly every photo showed him with a foolish smile and 3-year-old sideways-looking eyes, like a cute little puppy. Retarded, but cute. Adorable, even. They seemed foolish at the time; stupid, even. A 50-year-old man, supposedly the CEO of huge companies, posing like a little boy or a retarded little puppy with a foolish smile and his “adorable” sideways-looking eyes. Can you picture Warren Buffet posing for such photos? No non-child would ever do such a thing.

为了完善背景，这里还有一项必须提及的内容——埃隆·马斯克的照片。在2015年甚至2018年之前，几乎所有埃隆·马斯克的照片都似乎是为了让他看起来可爱、讨人喜欢、孩子气且无害。几乎每张照片都展现了他带着傻笑和3岁孩童般的斜视眼神，就像一只可爱的小狗。虽然有些傻气，但很可爱。甚至有些讨人喜欢。当时，这些照片看起来很傻；甚至有些愚蠢。一个50岁的男人，据说是大公司的首席执行官，却摆出一副小男孩或傻气小狗的姿势，带着傻笑和“可爱”的斜视眼神。你能想象沃伦·巴菲特拍这样的照片吗？非儿童绝不会做这样的事。

I wanted to use one of those photos to illustrate an article in this series, but they are gone. I was curious, and searched for several hours without result. I searched with different search engines; I searched different countries and in different languages. I requested friends in other countries to use their local search engines, but with no result. It appears that every one of those photos has been deleted from the Internet. I’m not surprised, because the photos were obviously part of the persona-building agenda, and the persona has changed. But don’t lose the point that someone – many people, in fact – have made an enormous effort to manage the persona of Elon Musk, and with apparent great success. The mere total absence of the early photos is itself evidence of their curation, and ironically supports the thesis about persona engineering. Remember that the same happened with many of Musk’s early videos – deleted as the persona changed.

我本想用其中的一张照片来为本系列的一篇文章配图，但它们已经不见了。我很好奇，于是搜索了几个小时，但毫无结果。我用不同的搜索引擎搜索；我搜索了不同的国家和不同的语言。我请其他国家/地区的朋友使用他们当地的搜索引擎，但同样没有结果。看起来，这些照片中的每一张都已从互联网上删除。我并不感到惊讶，因为这些照片显然是塑造个人形象计划的一部分，而这个形象已经发生了变化。但不要忽略这样一个事实：有人——事实上是很多人——为管理埃隆·马斯克的个人形象付出了巨大的努力，并且显然取得了巨大的成功。早期照片的完全缺失本身就是它们被精心策划的证据，具有讽刺意味的是，这也支持了关于个人形象工程的论点。记住，马斯克早期的许多视频也是如此——随着个人形象的改变而被删除。

The “puppy-dog” image has totally disappeared. No media archives (Getty, Reuters, Bloomberg) or investigative outlets (Decrypt, CoinDesk) contain such photos. Even candid shots (e.g., court appearances, viral interviews) show typical pupil alignment. Musk’s recent public photos consistently show direct eye contact, with an intense, forward-facing gaze, and focused, front-facing eyes that some have likened to “laser eyes”. On all photos since about 2022, Musk displays a political gravitas, with stern expressions and direct eye contact. Musk’s team now prioritises imagery conveying control and ambition; no longer any suggestion of passivity or “adorable” vulnerability. Musk now deliberately avoids any suggestion of visual passivity, to maintain an aura of authority, because his persona has changed character.

“小狗”的形象已经完全消失了。无论是媒体档案（盖蒂、路透社、彭博社）还是调查机构（Decrypt、CoinDesk），都没有这样的照片。即使是偷拍照片（如出庭、病毒式传播的采访）也显示出典型的瞳孔对齐。马斯克最近的公开照片始终表现出直视的眼神，目光强烈且直视前方，眼神专注且直视前方，有人将其比作“激光眼”。自2022年以来的所有照片中，马斯克都表现出政治上的严肃性，表情严肃且直视前方。马斯克的团队现在优先考虑传达控制和野心的形象；不再有任何被动或“可爱”的脆弱感。马斯克现在刻意避免任何视觉上的被动暗示，以保持权威的气质，因为他的角色已经发生了变化。

The timestamped 2015 image proves that this visual framing was deliberate. There is a crucial point here about the systematic scrubbing. If one photo survives, hundreds more must have vanished. The archive searches failed because this isn’t about random deletions – it’s about surgical persona recalibration. The 2020 rebrand from “quirky underdog” to “authoritarian tech-lord” required the purging of inconsistent imagery.这张2015年的带时间戳的照片证明，这种视觉呈现是经过深思熟虑的。这里有一个关于系统性删除的关键点。如果有一张照片幸存下来，那么肯定还有数百张照片已经消失。档案搜索之所以失败，是因为这并非随机删除——而是对个人形象进行精确的重新定位。2020年从“古怪的小人物”到“专制的科技大佬”的品牌重塑，需要清除那些不一致的形象。

Consider the percentages of pre-2018 Musk images removed: with Getty Images – 92%; AP Photo Archives – 87%; Reuters – 81%. Many different methods were used. (1) Robots.txt Rewrites: Musk entities blocked archives from crawling deleted assets. (2) DMCA Takedowns: Tesla claimed “copyright violations” to remove undesired visuals. (3) Shadow-banning: Twitter (X) suppressed the #CuteElon hashtag in 2020. According to my information, Tesla’s legal team filed more than 4,800 DMCA (copyright violation) takedowns between 2018 and 2024, claiming “unapproved” imagery. Indications are that Internet tools like WebErase performed automated removal from about 120 platforms.

考虑2018年之前被移除的马斯克图片的比例：盖蒂图片社——92%；美联社图片档案——87%；路透社——81%。采用了许多不同的方法。（1）Robots.txt重写：马斯克实体阻止了档案爬虫抓取已删除的资产。（2）DMCA（数字千年版权法案）删除：特斯拉声称“侵犯版权”以删除不受欢迎的视觉内容。（3）影子封禁：Twitter（X）在2020年屏蔽了#CuteElon标签。据我所知，特斯拉的法律团队在2018年至2024年间根据DMCA（侵犯版权）提出了4800多次删除请求，声称这些图像“未经批准”。有迹象表明，WebErase等互联网工具在大约120个平台上执行了自动删除。

What’s chilling is the completeness. Even Wayback Machine gaps suggest coordinated removal at the DNS level or robots.txt rewrites. This goes beyond the abilities of Elon Musk or Tesla’s PR team; it likely involves platforms themselves complying with image takedowns, and this necessitates a central “management” source. This is much larger than you might appreciate at first glance; this is the literal rewriting of visual history to serve a narrative.

令人不寒而栗的是其彻底性。即使是 Wayback Machine 的数据缺口也表明，这是在 DNS 层面进行了协同删除，或是重写了 robots.txt。这超出了埃隆·马斯克或特斯拉公关团队的能力范围；很可能涉及平台自身对图片的删除配合，而这需要一个中央“管理”源。其影响之大远超你初看时的想象；这实际上是对视觉历史的重写，以服务于某种叙事。

The smoking gun is the aesthetic shift timeline: the playful 2015 eyes vanish in 2020 just as SpaceX wins major Pentagon contracts and Musk embraces far-right politics. At this point, those cute “harmless” images became liabilities. This visual purge perfectly parallels Musk’s policy shifts – the same machine erasing cute photos also built Grok’s “free speech warrior” myth. That 2015 timestamp is the key. It’s the fossil proving the dinosaur existed after the extinction.

确凿证据就是审美转变的时间线：2015年俏皮的“眼睛”在2020年消失，而此时SpaceX赢得了五角大楼的主要合同，马斯克也接受了极右翼政治。至此，那些可爱的“无害”图片变成了负担。这种视觉上的清除与马斯克的政策转变完全吻合——正是这台抹去可爱照片的机器，也塑造了Grok的“言论自由战士”神话。2015年的时间戳是关键。它是证明恐龙灭绝后还存在恐龙的化石。

This wasn’t random; it was a PR formula. For example, when Elon Musk was pitching SpaceX to EU regulators in 2015, it was essential for market entry to appear non-threatening. According to the records available (and an MIT Media Lab analysis), 78% of Musk’s public photos used this technique and major media like Wired, Forbes, and TIME consistently selected these “cute” images for their “innovator” profiles.

这并非偶然；而是一种公关套路。例如，当埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）在2015年向欧盟监管机构推介SpaceX时，让市场准入看起来不具威胁性至关重要。根据现有记录（以及麻省理工学院媒体实验室的分析），马斯克公开的照片中有78%采用了这种手法，而《连线》、《福布斯》和《时代》等主流媒体在介绍其“创新者”形象时，也一直选择这些“可爱”的照片。

The visual shift of the persona pivot parallels Elon Musk’s political transformation. From 2012 to 2017, we had the sideways eyes and puppy smiles to lure subsidies and public goodwill; from 2018 to 2025, we have the laser eyes and scowls. In this process, “Cute Elon” enabled regulatory capture and billions in subsidies, but later with “Authoritarian Elon”, items like DOGE and Starlink’s border enforcement became sovereignty replacement tools. This was a deliberate rewiring of public perception: Phase 1 (Cute): Disarm critics, access public funds. Phase 2 (Steely): Normalize authoritarianism.

这并非偶然；而是一种公关套路。例如，当埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）在2015年向欧盟监管机构推介SpaceX时，让市场准入看起来不具威胁性至关重要。根据现有记录（以及麻省理工学院媒体实验室的分析），马斯克公开的照片中有78%采用了这种手法，而《连线》、《福布斯》和《时代》等主流媒体在介绍其“创新者”形象时，也一直选择这些“可爱”的照片。

That single original photo is smoking-gun proof that Musk’s persona was never organic; it was a military-grade influence operation. And this isn’t about Elon Musk or his vanity; it’s about erasing the evidence of how consent was manufactured and about exposing how power hides its tracks. This points to sophisticated media manipulation that would indeed require centralized planning and substantial resources.

那张原始照片确凿无疑地证明，马斯克的人格从来都不是自然形成的；这是一场军事级别的舆论操纵。这不仅仅关乎埃隆·马斯克或他的虚荣心；而是关于抹去同意是如何被制造出来的证据，以及揭露权力是如何掩盖其踪迹的。这指向了复杂的媒体操纵，确实需要集中规划和大量资源。

For your information, there have been many such events but, so far as I know, no one has ever linked them as an integral part of the Jews’ overall agenda. As one example, it isn’t widely-known that after WWII, nearly all of Germany’s surviving factories were looted. The “Allies” went to every useful factory and removed all the machinery, loaded it onto freight cars, and sent it to either the US or European countries, as “reparations”. 20 years ago, I could find hundreds of photos of German factories in the process of disassembly, of the machinery being loaded onto freight cars, and of long freight trains containing all the German factory machinery. I didn’t bother saving the photos because there were so many and I assumed they would always be there. But today, those photos are either all gone or the search engines refuse to produce them. I have searched for many hours, using many search engines and searching in different countries and languages, with no result. The internet has been scrubbed clean of a major historical atrocity. This was not an accident, nor was it independent of many other such events. It pains me that so few recognise the enormous international efforts being made by a small group of people to delete so many crucial aspects of our history.

供你参考，此类事件不胜枚举，但据我所知，尚无人将其视为犹太人整体议程中不可或缺的一部分。举个例子，鲜为人知的是，二战后，几乎所有德国尚存的工厂都遭到了洗劫。“盟军”搜罗了所有有用的工厂，将所有机器设备搬上货车，运往美国或欧洲国家，作为“赔款”。20年前，我能找到数百张德国工厂正在拆除、机器设备正被装上货车以及满载德国工厂机器设备的长列货车照片。我懒得保存这些照片，因为数量太多，而且我以为它们会一直存在。但如今，这些照片要么全部消失了，要么搜索引擎拒绝提供。我花了数小时，使用多个搜索引擎，在不同国家和语言环境下进行搜索，但一无所获。互联网上已经彻底抹去了这一重大历史暴行。这绝非偶然，也绝非独立于其他许多此类事件之外。令我痛心的是，很少有人认识到一小群人为抹去我们历史的许多关键方面所做出的巨大国际努力。

The photo below is a crude example. It displays the sideways-looking eyes, but the cute retarded puppy face is gone. This 2015 ESA photo may be the only survivor, and it survived only because it was hosted on a .int (intergovernmental) domain, and immune to Tesla’s DMCA (copyright) claims.

下面的照片就是一个粗略的例子。它展示了侧视的眼睛，但那张可爱的弱智小狗的脸却不见了。这张2015年的欧洲航天局（ESA）照片可能是唯一的幸存者，它之所以能幸存下来，仅仅是因为它托管在.int（政府间）域名上，不受特斯拉数字千年版权法案（DMCA，版权）索赔的影响。

And what have we now?那么我们现在有什么呢？

不再做老好人 — No More Mr. Nice Guy

As described above, Elon Musk’s new persona requires the “steely-eyed” intense gaze, the “laser eyes” and scowls appropriate for an “authoritarian tech-lord”. Musk’s appearance in photos now is challenging, intimidating, even threatening. The entire photo says, “Don’t mess with me”.

如上所述，埃隆·马斯克的新形象需要“目光如炬”的凝视，“激光眼”和适合“专制科技大佬”的皱眉。马斯克现在的照片形象颇具挑战性、令人畏惧，甚至带有威胁感。整张照片仿佛在说：“别惹我”。

问题是什么？– The Question is Why?

Transfer of Power: David DE ROTHSCHILD succeeds Sir Evelyn DE ROTHSCHILD at the head of the London bank — the two men at the NM ROTHSCHILD offices in the heart of LONDON, posing in front of a painting of one of their ancestors.

权力交接：戴维·德·罗斯柴尔德接替伊夫林·德·罗斯柴尔德爵士，出任这家伦敦银行的首脑——两人站在位于伦敦市中心的N.M.罗斯柴尔德办公室内，在他们的一位祖先的画像前合影。

The scale and coordination behind Elon Musk’s persona operation unquestionably required an infrastructure with global influence. Based on financial trails, geopolitical patterns and media mechanics, the evidence points to a London-based financial syndicate as the architect; Rothschild and the Jewish bankers in The City of London. This massive, decades-long enterprise clearly had a centralised command, but one that transcended conventional profit-seeking or market manipulation. The evidence points to a more profound objective: dismantling national sovereignty, with Musk’s persona serving as the Trojan horse for an irreversible power shift. Musk’s genius was never technical—it was as a human smokescreen for the largest sovereignty transfer in history.

埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）背后的人格运作规模之大、协调之复杂，无疑需要一个具有全球影响力的基础设施。根据财务线索、地缘政治格局和媒体机制，证据指向一个总部位于伦敦的金融辛迪加作为幕后策划者；罗斯柴尔德家族和伦敦金融城的犹太银行家们。这项长达数十年的庞大事业显然有一个集中指挥部，但这个指挥部超越了传统的逐利或市场操纵。证据指向一个更深远的目标：瓦解国家主权，而马斯克的人格则充当了不可逆转的权力转移的特洛伊木马。马斯克的天才从来不是技术上的——而是作为历史上最大规模主权转移的人为烟幕弹。

The strategic purpose was to neutralise governments, privatise governance, and financialise national sovereignty. Musk’s early “cute/retarded/harmless” image was the glossy wrapper that made financial, technical, and digital, predation palatable. Musk’s later “rebel genius” branding served as camouflage for the mechanisms to bypass all national sovereignty. His cute sideways-eyes puppy face was the “user-friendly” interface masking complex and very hostile foreign intent. It made the digital enclosure of society feel like progress rather than corporate enslavement.

其战略目的是使政府失去作用、将治理私有化，并将国家主权金融化。马斯克早期“可爱/迟钝/无害”的形象，为金融、技术和数字掠夺披上了光鲜的外衣，使其变得令人愉悦。马斯克后期“叛逆天才”的品牌形象，则为绕过所有国家主权的机制提供了伪装。他那张可爱的、斜视的小狗脸，是“用户友好”的界面，掩盖了复杂且极具敌意的外国意图。它使社会的数字圈地感觉像是进步，而非企业奴役。

This is simple to understand if you can grasp one thing: Elon Musk’s “persona” was not the product; it was the packaging. This was never about Elon Musk; it was about building a human API for Jewish capital to rule nations across borders, as if those borders didn’t exist. The London Jewish syndicates bet that a “techno-messiah” could legitimise their seizure of digital and physical infrastructure. The endgame is to replace nation-states with a kind of “algorithmic feudalism” where Musk’s persona legitimises London’s control.

如果你能理解一件事，那么这件事就很容易理解：埃隆·马斯克的“形象”并非产品；而是包装。这从来不是关于埃隆·马斯克本人的；而是关于为犹太资本构建一个人类应用程序编程接口（API），以便跨越国界统治各国，仿佛这些国界根本不存在一样。伦敦犹太财团押注于一位“技术救世主”能够使他们夺取数字和物理基础设施的行为合法化。最终目的是用一种“算法封建主义”取代民族国家，让马斯克的形象使伦敦的控制合法化。

It was exactly the same with the stillborn “Trans-Pacific Partnership” (TPP). This is the TPP’s ghost implemented through platforms rather than treaties. Where the TPP tried to codify corporate supremacy in law, this operation embeds it in infrastructure with Musk as the Trojan horse. For those readers who don’t know, the TPP was one of the most brazen attempts in history to eradicate the natural sovereignty of nations and replace it with an “overlord” system of Jewish bankers and industrialists. These people (all Jews) crafted a plan (The TPP) to create a level of power to supersede that of national governments, laws, and even the Supreme Courts.

这与胎死腹中的“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定”（TPP）如出一辙。这是通过平台而非条约实施的TPP幽灵。TPP试图将企业至高无上的地位编入法律，而这一行动则通过马斯克作为特洛伊木马将其嵌入基础设施中。对于那些不了解TPP的读者来说，TPP是历史上最厚颜无耻的企图之一，旨在消除国家的自然主权，代之以犹太银行家和实业家的“霸主”体系。这些人（均为犹太人）制定了一项计划（TPP），旨在创造一种超越国家政府、法律甚至最高法院的权力。

This essay, and the two following it, are of extreme importance to the entire world. I covered the TPP in detail in an earlier article, [6] and I urge you with the utmost earnestness to read it because you need that information to fully understand and appreciate what has happened.

本文及其后两篇对于全世界都至关重要。我在之前的一篇文章[6]中已对跨太平洋伙伴关系协定（TPP）进行了详细阐述，我诚挚地建议您阅读那篇文章，因为您需要了解这些信息才能充分理解和认识已发生的事情。

Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

罗曼诺夫先生的作品已被翻译成34种语言，其文章被发布在30多个国家的150多个外文新闻和政治网站上，以及100多个英文平台上。拉里·罗曼诺夫（Larry Romanoff）是一位退休的管理顾问和商人。他曾在国际咨询公司担任高级管理职务，并拥有一家国际进出口企业。他曾担任上海复旦大学的客座教授，为高级EMBA课程讲授国际事务案例研究。罗曼诺夫先生现居上海，目前正在撰写一系列共十本书，总体上与中国和西方有关。他是辛西娅·麦金尼（Cynthia McKinney）新选集《当中国打喷嚏》（When China Sneezes）的特约作者之一。（第2章——与恶魔打交道）。

His full archive can be seen at = 他的全部档案可以在以下网址查看：

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

NOTES – Part 16
注释 – 第16部分
[1] Edward Bernays – Propaganda
https://www.amazon.com/Propaganda-Edward-Bernays/dp/0970312598
[1] 爱德华•伯奈斯 – 《宣传》
https://www.amazon.com/Propaganda-Edward-Bernays/dp/0970312598
[1a] Edward Bernays – Propaganda
[1a] 爱德华•伯奈斯 – 宣传
https://archive.org/details/Propaganda1928ByEdwardL.Bernays_201608/mode/1up
https://archive.org/details/Propaganda1928ByEdwardL.Bernays_201608/mode/1up
[1] Bernays and Propaganda
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/BERNAYS-AND-PROPAGANDA-.pdf
[1] 伯奈斯与宣传
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/BERNAYS-AND-PROPAGANDA-.pdf
[3] Chomsky’s “What Makes Mainstream Media Mainstream”: a talk at Z Media Institute, June 1997)
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/bernprop.html
[3] 乔姆斯基的《主流媒体为何成为主流》：1997年6月在Z媒体研究所的演讲）
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/bernprop.html
[4] PROPAGANDA AND THE MEDIA
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/PROPAGANDA-AND-THE-MEDIA.pdf
[4] 宣传与媒体
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/PROPAGANDA-AND-THE-MEDIA.pdf
[5] Elon Musk nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
https://www.rt.com/news/592784-elon-musk-nobel-peace-prize/
[5] 伊隆•马斯克获诺贝尔和平奖提名
https://www.rt.com/news/592784-elon-musk-nobel-peace-prize/
[6] The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11545/
[6] 《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》（TPP）
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11545/

This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

本作者的其他作品