CN — LARRY ROMANOFF: 生物战在行动 — 第5章-世界卫生组织-人口减少是现实

December 25, 2023


生物战在行动 — Biological Warfare in Action 

    • 第1章—— 引言 — Chapter 1  — Introduction                                                                    
    • 第2章——美国国内项目和实验 — Chapter 2 — US Domestic Projects and Experiments                      
    • 第3章——美国可疑疫情 — Chapter 3 — US Suspicious Outbreaks                                              
    • 第4章——美国海外部署 — Chapter 4 — US Foreign Deployment                                                 
    • 第5章-世界卫生组织-人口减少是现实 — Chapter 5 — The WHO – Depopulation is Reality                            
    • 第6章——辉瑞公司对流行病把握的恰到好处 — Chapter 6 — Pfizer’s Perfectly-Timed Epidemic                                
    • 第7章——美国禽流感 — Chapter 7 — US Bird flu                                                                           
    • 第8章——英国口蹄疫 — Chapter 8 — UK Foot and Mouth Disease                                          
    • 第9章——意大利的橄榄树 — Chapter 9 —  Italy’s Olive Trees                                                              
    • 第10章——最近的生物武器袭击 — Chapter 10 – Recent Bio-Weapons Attacks                                        
    • 第11章——艾滋病 — Chapter 11 – AIDS                                                                                     
    • 第12章——非典型肺炎 — Chapter 12 – SARS                                                                                    
    • 第13章——中东呼吸综合征 — Chapter 13 – MERS                                                                                 
    • 第14章——埃博拉病毒 — Chapter 14 – EBOLA                                                                                
    • 第15 寨——卡病毒 — Chapter 15 –  ZIKA                                                                                    
    • 第16章——新冠肺炎疫苗和Oxitec的“飞行注射器” — Chapter 16 – COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s “Flying Syringes”
    • 第17章——尾声 — Chapter 17 – Epilogue  



5.第5章——世界卫生组织——人口减少是现实 –5. Chapter 5 – The WHO – Depopulation is Reality


By Larry Romanoff




5.1. Introduction                        5.1.

5.2. And Polio, Too . . .                5.2. 脊髓灰质炎也是……

5.3. And Meningitis . . .                5.3. 脑膜炎

5.4. And EBOLA . . .                     5.4. 埃博拉病毒……

5.5. A Chinese “Experiment”?             5.5. 中国实验

5.6. Back to Depopulation                5.6. 回到人口减少

5.7. A Successful Genocide               5.7. 成功的种族灭绝

5.8. And Yet More . . .                  5.8. 还有更多……

5.9. Epilogue                            5.9. 结语



5.1. 介绍 — 5.1. Introduction


Doctors in Kenya have accused UNICEF, the World Health Organization and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation of secretly trying to sterilise millions of women in Africa via a tetanus vaccine program. Source



This qualifies as one of the largest false-flag operations in human history, a story that almost beggars belief but with the facts too clear to refute. It began its life as yet another “conspiracy theory” but soon lost that label because overwhelming and irrefutable evidence was uncovered which moved this series of events from ‘conspiracy’ mode to ‘proven fact’ mode.



The story is not complicated. During the early 1990s, the WHO had organised and been overseeing massive tetanus vaccination campaigns in Nicaragua, Mexico, the Philippines, Tanzania, Nigeria, and a few other countries. Shortly after the initiation of these programs, concerns began to emerge about spontaneous abortions and other complications arising exclusively within the vaccinated populations.



Tetanus is a disease whose onset we often associate with stepping on a rusty nail or similar event. It should be clear that men and children would be at least as likely, if not more likely, to encounter this circumstance than would women, and perhaps careless children more than adults, but the WHO vaccination program was directed only to females from 15 to 45 years of age – in other words, child-bearing ages. In Nicaragua, the targets were females from 12 to 49 years of age. Also, a single tetanus shot is universally accepted as sufficient to provide protection for ten years or more, but the WHO inexplicably insisted on vaccinating these women five times within several months.



Mexico was suspicious of the WHO tetanus campaign because it excluded all males and children and called for injections of the vaccine only in females of child-bearing age, and insisted on the multiple vaccinations. Based on its suspicions, Mexico had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed, and it was discovered the WHO’s “tetanus” vaccine contained the Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone.



This hormone is critical to the female body during pregnancy. It causes the release of other hormones that prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilised egg. Without it, a woman’s body is unable to sustain a pregnancy and the fetus will be aborted. This hormone was injected into the subjects along with the tetanus serum, causing a female body to then recognise both as foreign agents and to develop antibodies to destroy either if they were to ever appear in the body in the future. Upon becoming pregnant, a woman’s body would fail to recognize hCG as a friend and would produce anti-hCG antibodies, the prior vaccination now inducing her body’s immune system to attack the hormone that is needed to bring an unborn child to term, preventing subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which is necessary to sustain them. This means each woman who received the WHO tetanus inoculation was vaccinated not only against tetanus but also against pregnancy. [1] [2] [3]

这种激素在怀孕期间对女性身体至关重要。它会释放其他激素,为受精卵的植入做好子宫内膜的准备。如果没有它女性的身体将无法维持妊娠胎儿也将流产。这种激素与破伤风血清一起注射到受试者体内,使女性身体识别出两者都是外来病原体,并产生抗体,如果它们将来出现在体内,就会破坏其中一种。怀孕后女性的身体将无法将hCG识别为朋友并会产生抗hCG抗体之前的疫苗接种现在会诱导其身体的免疫系统攻击使未出生的孩子足月所需的激素过杀死维持它们所需的hCG来防止随后的怀孕。这意味着每一位接种世界卫生组织破伤风疫苗的妇女不仅接种了破伤风疫苗,还接种了怀孕疫苗。 [1] [2] [3]

Note that Mexico resisted population control policies, but the World Bank “insisted the country do something to cut down its population growth.”Source



The Mexican authorities immediately notified representatives in more than 60 countries, and it was discovered that similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG were used in the other countries as well. When this information became public, the WHO at first denied the facts and disparaged the results of the initial tests, assuming an offensive and repugnant stand, mocking and ridiculing the nations that had performed the tests and revealed the contamination, condemning them as incompetent, having “unsuitable” testing laboratories, and using improper samples or procedures. WHO officials claimed these nations had “Not the right kind of lab to do the test. The labs know only how to test urine samples . . .” Then, in the face of repeated similar discoveries, the WHO finally admitted that “perhaps” “a small percentage” of the vaccines had been “contaminated” with hCG, but stated that it was “harmless”. When Nigeria discovered the same hormone in the vaccine, Nigerian physicians reported that WHO doctors assured them the hCG hormone “would have no effect on human reproduction” – statements that they knew to be false.



This is the standard response by Western agencies, governments, and corporations, when caught with adulterated products. When Coca-Cola’s drinks in China were found to contain frightening levels of pesticides and chlorine, the immediate accusation was that China’s biological laboratories were all incompetent. When Nestle’s noodles in India were found to contain dangerously toxic amounts of lead, India’s laboratories were all incompetent. The next step is to carefully produce a few samples known to be uncontaminated, provide them to an “independent” laboratory that inevitably pronounces them clean, then move the story off the front page.



However, following this revelation, and the WHO’s admission of “contamination”, each nation had extensive tests conducted by expert independent labs, and in all cases the hCG hormone was identified as existing in the tetanus vaccination serum. The WHO eventually went silent and discontinued their program, but by this time about 150 million women had been vaccinated – and rendered sterile.



One important fact is that the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used in this project were developed, produced, and distributed in secrecy and that none had ever been tested or licensed for use, sale, or distribution, anywhere in the world. The companies that produced them were the Rothschild-owned Connaught Laboratories in CanadaIntervex from Canada, and Australia’s CSL LaboratoriesConnaught is the same firm that, along with the Canadian Red Cross, knowingly distributed AIDS-contaminated blood products for several years during the 1980s, a criminal organisation that should have been executed along with its owners. You can read the essay, “Canada’s Tainted Blood”[4] Following its outstanding criminal history in Canada, Connaught was sold to Rothschild and now forms part of his Sanofi Group, the criminality clearly continuing and now on a worldwide scale.



Further damning evidence that the Western media censoredwas the fact that the WHO had been actively involved for more than 20 years prior in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier – precisely the same combination as in these vaccines. According to the WHO’s own reports, they had spent 20 years and more than $400 million on this specific sterilisation research. More than 20 research articles have been written on this subject, many of these by the WHO itself, that document in detail the WHO’s attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid.



PubMed reported that in 1972 the WHO established a special “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” (read sterilisation), which consisted of “international, multidisciplinary groups of scientists and clinicians collaborating in research” on the specific goal of [finding] “substances capable of mounting antifertility responses in women“. And again, “Over the past 18 years, the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines…” [5] You can’t be more clear than that.



I examined carefully the WHO website and discovered more than a dozen articles written by WHO researchers, documenting in detail the WHO’s attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as a carrier. One need only search the WHO website for hCG to find the reports. Some leading articles included:



“Clinical profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,” Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268.



“Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335.



Anti-hCG Vaccines are in Clinical Trials,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 123-126.



Europe PubMedCentral published articles specifically on the antigenicity effects of hCG in tetanus toxoid. For those who don’t know, “antigenicity” is the capacity of a substance to produce an immune response, in this case whether the hCG in the vaccination would be sufficient to render females “immune” to pregnancy:



“Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335. And: “Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid[6]

“候选抗妊娠疫苗的抗原性和临床效果观察:与破伤风类毒素相关的人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基”,《生育与不孕》,1980年10月,第328-335页。以及:“候选抗妊娠疫苗的抗原性和临床效果观察:与破伤风类毒素相关的绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基。 [6]


The Lancet published “Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine” June 11 1988, pp. 1295-1298. “Vaccines for Fertility Regulation,” Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction, Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988). [7]



The US NCBI published an article essentially boasting of “A vaccine that prevents pregnancy in women“. [8] The Lancet published records of a WHO “Phase 1 Clinical trials of this same vaccine, [9] the NCBI doing the same. [10] Europe PubMed Central published another article confirming the success of the trials. [11] PubMed also published a review of three such vaccines developed, which displayed “progressively better attributes” in sterilising women, stating that the clinical trials proved the “effective prevention of pregnancy” in sexually active women of proven fertility. [12]

美国NCBI发表了一篇文章,主要吹嘘一种预防女性怀孕的疫苗[8]《柳叶刀》发表了世界卫生组织“同一疫苗的1期临床试验记录,[9] NCBI也在做同样的事情。[10] 欧洲PubMed Central发表了另一篇文章证实了试验的成功。[11]PubMed还发表了一篇对三种此类疫苗的综述,这些疫苗在女性绝育方面表现出越来越好的特性并指出临床试验证明在性活跃且已证明生育能力的女性中有效预防怀孕 [12]


Worthy of note is that both the WHO and these august medical journals told one huge lie. According to PubMed, “clinical trials have proven … the reversibility of the anti-hCG vaccine(s) in women”. Europe PubMed Central stated that “the vaccine prevents pregnancy” but that clinical trials “indicated the reversibility” of these vaccines. (See references 4 and 5). However, what they didn’t mention was that the “reversibility” resulted merely from the immunisation naturally wearing off after a period of time, and that this was for a single vaccination. They didn’t mention that the reason for the 5 injections was to make all females permanently “immune” to pregnancy.



The WHO has been in the depopulation business for decades. Source



As early as 1978, the WHO was actively exploring ways to eradicate much of the population of the Third World. A paper published by the WHO [13] was titled, “Evaluating … placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation”The paper acknowledged “substantial progress” in its worldwide eugenics program of culling non-whites, but yet identified “an urgent need for a greater variety of methods” of preventing fertility, and gushed over the fact that “immunisation as a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted”, that the employment of sterilisation vaccines would be widely appealing (to those dispensing the vaccines) and would offer “great ease of delivery”.



If that isn’t clear, the WHO is saying that vaccinations for other purposes – protection against diseases – are so common and widely-accepted, that inoculation is probably the easiest way to sterilise the populations of undeveloped countries. The paper then notes the accumulation of evidence that “there exist proteins specific to the reproductive system” which “could be blocked” by vaccinations and provide a new method of “fertility regulation”. Among the stated advantages of a sterilisation vaccine is that it could prevent or disrupt implantation of the fertilised egg onto the uterus wall, and thereby guarantee that every conception would result in a miscarriage or spontaneous abortion, i.e., an anti-hCG vaccine. The paper continues:



Testing … will reveal whether a single injection is sufficient to achieve the desired level of immunization, or whether several boosting injections will be required. The main desired effect is to achieve a degree of immunization sufficient to: (a) neutralize the hormonal activity of hCG in vivo; and (b) prevent or disrupt implantation at a very early stage of pregnancy. It is not yet established whether immunization with the β hCG peptide conjugate will cause an irreversible biological neutralization of hCG … This will probably vary from individual to individual. In the first case, the indication for immunization will be restricted to sterilizationwhereas in the second eventuality … immunization may be considered as a long-lasting but reversible anti-fertility measure.”


测试……将揭示一次注射是否足以达到所需的免疫水平,或者是否需要多次加强注射。主要期望的效果是达到一定程度的免疫,足以:(a)体内中和hCG的激素活性;(b)在怀孕的早期阶段预防或破坏植入。β hCG肽偶联物的免疫接种是否会引起hCG的不可逆生物中和尚不确定……这可能因人而异。在第一种情况下免疫接种的适应症将仅限于绝育而在第二种情况下……免疫接种可能被视为一种持久但可逆的抗生育措施。

On August 17-18, 1992, the WHO produced a report titled “Fertility Regulating Vaccines”, resulting from a large meeting in Geneva of scientists and ‘women’s health advocates’ “to review the current status of the development of fertility regulating vaccines.” The meeting was from a joint Special Program of research in reproduction of the UNDPUNFPA, the WHO and the World Bank. The report stated, “… applied research on FRV’s (fertility-regulating vaccines) has been going on for more than twenty years …”, and discussed not only the anti-hCG vaccines already receiving clinical trials, but the development of other vaccines such as an anti-GnRH vaccine that would extend the temporary infertility due to breast-feeding.



Even more chilling is that one WHO report – still on their website – discusses the certainty of the vaccinations causing spontaneous abortions since some significant number of the inoculated females would be pregnant at the time of vaccination. The report offers no commentary on this. It was clear the WHO had no intention of performing pregnancy tests prior to administering the vaccines, thus coldly accepting the fact that they would be killing at least some millions of unborn fetuses.



This vaccine was also being field-tested at the time, with the possible intention of employing both antigens in the same vaccine on the assumption that a single vaccine might not sterilise all victims. They recognised the dangers of administering such a vaccine to women who were already pregnant, and expressed awareness the antibodies would almost certainly be present in the milk and might therefore render the infants permanently sterile as well – with the massive understatement that this “might not be acceptable to all potential users …”



From the outset, WHO planners realised that during mass vaccinations, many pregnant women would also be inoculated with the anti-hCG serum, which would inevitably result not only in sterilisation, miscarriages and spontaneous abortions but also incurable autoimmune disorders and birth defects.


Critical Periods of Prenatal Development. This image summarizes the three developmental periods in prenatal development. The blue images indicate where major development is happening and the aqua indicate where refinement is happening. As shown, the majority of organs are particularly susceptible during the embryonic period. The central nervous system still continues to develop in major ways through the fetal period as well. Source



The same paper went on to state, “In addition to women being immunized inadvertently during an established pregnancy, fetuses could be exposed to potential teratological effects of immunization …”. In other words, WHO staff would freely inoculate pregnant women, those embryos or fetuses not spontaneously aborting would experience pathological growth from which would result various undefined birth defects.



The WHO was not researching ‘reproductive health’, but reproductive impossibility, and their tetanus-hCG vaccine is not in any sense ‘regulating’ the fertility of women but rendering their fertility biologically impossible, which is not quite the same thing. Their own paper stated the vaccination likely “will cause an irreversible biological neutralization of hCG”, which means the permanent sterilisation of innocent women who agreed to receive tetanus shots.



Try to understand what this means: the WHO was for decades receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in funding (largely through Bill Gates) for research and testing, to produce a vaccine that would make a woman’s immune system attack and destroy her own babies in the womb, a vaccine they would surreptitiously combine with a tetanus vaccination without informing the victims. To say their deceit was successful would be an understatement. The WHO inoculated approximately 150 million women in 52 countries with this vaccine, permanently sterilising the entire lot of them without their knowledge or consent.



To recap:


It was only when an enormous number of women in all countries experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages immediately after the vaccinations, that the hormone additive was discovered as the cause. Suspicions were aroused when the WHO selected only females of child-bearing age and further specified the unheard-of practice of five multiple injections over a three-month period, but the health officials in these undeveloped countries still had faith in the white man’s medicine.



When the discovery of the hCG was made, many nations enacted immediate legal restraining orders against WHO and UNICEF vaccine programs. WHO and UNICEF officials said the “grave allegations” were “not backed up by evidence”, which was nonsenseUNICEFUSAID and the WHO refused to address the evidence like vaginal bleeding, miscarriages and spontaneous abortions. They also refused to discuss the reasons for a series of five closely-spaced vaccinations when one had always been sufficient for tetanus, ignoring the content of their own published papers stating that multiple injections of a tetanus-hCG vaccine would be necessary for effective sterilisation.



When faced with documented results, WHO officials admitted the hormone did indeed exist “in small amounts” in “some” of the vaccine material, but that this was an inconsequential result of “accidental contamination”. Nobody at the WHO attempted to explain the source of the hCG hormone in sufficient volume to contaminate about 750 million doses of a vaccine, nor how that “contamination” could “accidentally” have inserted itself into all those vaccines. Anyone familiar with large-scale vaccine or drug manufacture knows that the process is mechanical and fully-automated, essentially a closed system. It is not possible in such an environment to introduce contaminants of any kind, unless done deliberately. And the amount of hCG necessary to contaminate 750 million doses of a vaccine would have to consist of tens of thousands of liters, hardly ‘small amounts’.



The Lancet reported that the US National Institute of Health supplied much of the hCG hormone for WHO experiments and testing. For the NIH to have submitted this amount of hormone to Canada, where Connaught’s labs are located, would absolutely have attracted the attention of Canada’s customs officials and thus Canada’s national government, which has to mean that Canada was fully aware of what was happening, and whyLet me state again that this vaccine was created surreptitiously, was never declared, was never tested, and was never approved for use on humans.



The WHO went silent for a while, but in 2015, Vatican Radio charged that the UN organisations WHO and UNICEF were again executing vast international programs of depopulating the earth by using vaccines to surreptitiously sterilise women in Third World countries, this time in Kenya. It stated that “Catholic Bishops in Kenya have been opposed to the nationwide Tetanus Vaccination Campaign targeting 2.3 million Kenyan women and girls of reproductive age between 15-49 years, terming the campaign a secret government plan to sterilize women and control population growth”. [14] In May of 2018, it was reported that fertility-regulating vaccines were being used in India[15]

世界卫生组织沉默了一段时间但在2015梵蒂冈电台责联合国组织世界卫生组织和联合国儿童基金会再次执行大规模的国际计划过使用疫苗在第三世界国家秘密绝育妇女减少地球人口这次是在肯尼亚。它指出,“肯尼亚天主教主教反对针对230万肯尼亚15-49岁育龄妇女和女孩的全国性破伤风疫苗接种运动,称该运动是政府为妇女绝育和控制人口增长的秘密计划”。[14] 20185报道印度正在使用调节生育能力的疫苗。 [15]


The media were too busy at the time telling us of the evils of Iran, to notice the small issue of Rothschild manufacturing 750 million doses of a vaccine meant to sterilise 150 million women. As I’ve often mentioned elsewhere, the Western (Jewish) media are excessively fond of demonising Hitler, but Hitler didn’t sterilise 150 million Jews without their knowledge or consent. Yet Rothschild (a Jew) produced the vaccine to sterilise 150 million women without their knowledge, so where is the moral outrage against the Jews?


5.2. 脊髓灰质炎也是 — 5.2. And Polio, Too . . .


Polio workers hold up a banner during a 5-day campaign to vaccinate 2.6 million children in Kenya in July 2019. ©WHO/Kenya. Source



Something similar is true for polio. Few people are aware that polio cases in the world today no longer result from any natural spread of the disease but are now the result of WHO vaccination campaigns. [16] The WHO’s cheap and easily-administered oral polio vaccines have proven responsible for the increasing recurrence of polio in many countries. An independent medical group tasked with monitoring these events, wrote that polio [because of the WHO practices] was “spreading uncontrolled in West Africa, bursting geographical boundaries and raising fundamental questions . . .” It further described the WHO’s attitude toward terminating this pandemic of vaccine-caused polio cases as “relaxed”. I might have used a stronger term.



Banned in Western countries and Israel, the oral polio vaccine is not trusted in poor countries and is often met with resistance among parents in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan where they are forced upon the population at gunpoint. Photo by Asif Hassan/ AFP. Source



In 2009, there was a spreading outbreak of Polio in Nigeria, a direct result of yet another WHO vaccination programthis time directly linked to the vaccine which was made from a live polio virus which always carries a risk of causing polio instead of protecting against it – as the Americans learned to their chagrin many years ago. Today in the West, polio vaccines are made from a killed virus that cannot cause polio. This latest WHO-sponsored outbreak actually began several years prior, which the WHO blamed on the live virus in their vaccines that had somehow “mutated”. So once again, the WHO is causing polio in the undeveloped world, amid evidence that for every case of identified polio there are hundreds of other children who don’t develop the disease but remain carriers and pass it on to others. It has long been recognised that the live oral vaccine used by the WHO can easily cause the very epidemics it pretends to be eliminating. Of course there is no published evidence that the polio virus had in fact “mutated”. The same occurred in Kenya, this time using the hCG hormone tied to polio vaccinations, with the same tragic results but with the added benefit of permanently sterilising the survivors. [17]



Syrian health workers administer polio vaccination to a girl at a school in Damascus, in this file photo taken by Syria’s national news agency SANA on October 20, 2013. (REUTERS/SANA/Handout). Source

叙利亚国家通讯社SANA于2013年10月20日拍摄的这张档案照片中,叙利亚卫生工作者在大马士革一所学校为一名女孩接种脊髓灰质炎疫苗。 (路透社/SANA/讲义)。来源


In late 2013, Syria experienced a sudden outbreak of polio, the first in that country in about 20 years, and in an area that had been under the control of US-backed revolutionary mercenaries. The Syrian government claimed to have evidence that these foreigners brought the disease into the country from Pakistan, from Western (US) agencies. The WHO was active in Pakistan in yet another of its “humanitarian vaccination programs” that strangely coincided in geographic area with a severe outbreak of polio,and Syrian authorities were adamant that the West transmitted it to their nation when 1.7 million doses of polio vaccine were purchased by UNICEF, in spite of the fact that no cases of polio had been seen since 1999. After the mass vaccination program started, cases of polio began to reappear in Syria.



It all began when French pharmaceutical firm Sanofi Pasteur released a statement in November 2017 that its new dengue vaccine, Denvaxia, posed a risk of more severe dengue for people who have not been previously infected by the virus. It led to a congressional investigation into the deaths of 600 children who had received the vaccine and a dramatic drop in public confidence about all vaccines, including measles and polio. Source



UNICEF began a similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral polio vaccine in the Philippines in spite of the fact there were no reported cases of polio in the Philippines since 1993. This would fit the pattern from other instances of sudden disease emergencies. I have not managed yet to reconstruct the WHO’s vaccination and other programs in all locations, but sudden outbreaks of viruses are always suspicious since they cannot be created from nothing and must be introduced into a population, and with surprising regularity appear on the heels of some WHO vaccination program. The sudden and inexplicable appearance of the Bubonic plague in Peru and Madagascar are two such events and, increasingly often, the pathogens do not appear to be natural in origin. In particular, the SARS-related camel virus in the Middle East had some obvious signs of human engineering as did the SARS coronavirus itself. There are many other such cases which are far too often linked with the presence of some program of the WHO. In the cases I have identified, it is uncanny that the outbreaks of all these new diseases appear to follow immediately upon yet another WHO vaccination campaign, and inevitably in the precise geographical locations of the WHO activities.


5.3. 脑膜炎。– 5.3. And Meningitis . . .


In 1996 Pfizer developed a new antibiotic called Trovan to treat a variety of infections – meningitis being one example. Many of these new antibiotics are very powerful and with side effects that normally make them too dangerous to use for children, often causing permanent liver damage, joint disease and many other debilitating complications. Inexplicably, Pfizer decided to perform test trials on infants. However, Pfizer had the standard problem that FDA certification in the US required clinical trials on humans, and these are almost impossible to conduct in developed countries because no parents are willing to allow their children to take part in such risky clinical trials, to say nothing of the lawsuits resulting from trials gone bad. Therefore, these pharma companies tend almost universally to take their trials to poor countries in Africa, Asia and South America where the laws are unprepared and the people don’t understand the risks of untested and unapproved drugs. The American (and European) pharma companies therefore transformed the developing world into an enormous test laboratory that carries no financial liability.



As luck would have it, at precisely the moment when Pfizer was ready to commence clinical trials of this new drug, Nigeria was suddenly and inexplicably hit with one of the worst meningitis epidemics in history. And of course, Pfizer was there to conduct a reprehensible clinical trial for its new medication, on a group of victims unlikely to complain. Pfizer gathered a trial group and a control group, giving one group Pfizer’s new medication and a competitor’s product to the other. After experimenting on about 200 victims, they gathered their test information and left.



Anas Mustapha, one of the children given the experimental drug Trovan, pictured in 2007. Photograph: George Osodi/AP. Source

阿纳斯·穆斯塔法,2007 年,一名服用了试验药物特洛芬的儿童。照片:乔治·奥索迪/美联社。来源


That would have been the end, except that a controversy erupted soon after about the relationship between Pfizer’s need for test trials and the meningitis outbreak. As it happened, the WHO was in Nigeria immediately prior to that time on another of its “life-saving” vaccination programs, this time for polio, and the timing and location of the meningitis outbreak apparently matched perfectly the WHO’s polio vaccination program. And of course, it perfectly matched Pfizer’s need for large numbers of test subjectsThere were lawsuits and payments, accusations and denials, but to this day Nigeria refuses WHO entry into the country and will not participate in any further “humanitarian” aid from the UN or the WHO.



We cannot definitively say that the WHO deliberately created the meningitis epidemic for the benefit of Pfizer’s tests, but it’s the only theory that fits all the known facts and it’s the kind of thing the WHO appears to do on a regular basis.



The NCBI revealed a “secret report” showing that Pfizer was at fault in the Nigerian drug tests. [18] A website on the History of Vaccines reported on the Origins of Vaccine Hesitancy, attributing this to Pfizer’s abominable experiment. [19] The UK Guardian [20] and Science Magazine [21] reported on the lawsuits by Nigerian families, and the Washington Post reported on permanent fears in the country about any vaccine rollouts. [22]

美国国家生物技术信息中心公布的一份“秘密报告”显示,辉瑞公司在尼日利亚药物测试中存在过错[19]疫苗史网站报道了疫苗犹豫的起源,并将其归咎于辉瑞公司令人憎恶的实验。[19]英国《卫报》[20]和《科学杂志》[21]报道了尼日利亚家庭的诉讼,而华盛顿邮报》报道了该国对任何疫苗推广的永久性恐惧。 [22]


5.4. 和埃博拉病毒。– 5.4. And EBOLA . . .



There were reports of the Ebola virus emerging simultaneously in several African countries in the middle of 2014. It was surprising to learn that the variety of Ebola that appeared was “an especially powerful mutated strain that had no apparent natural origin and immediately raised questions in many minds of having been engineered.” This caught my attention because the circumstances seemed so familiar – (a) a sudden, inexplicable outbreak of a new, unusual, and deadly disease, (b) in dispersed but focused locations, (c) with nobody searching for the origin, (d) claims that the virus was primarily race-specific, affecting primarily Africans, and (e) the WHO once again in full attendance. Several physicians wrote an article titled, “There is no natural disease called Ebola”,  and the Wall Street Journal ran an interesting article titled, “Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus”. [23]

2014年年中,有报道称埃博拉病毒同时在几个非洲国家出现。令人惊讶的是现的埃博拉病毒是一种特别强大的变异毒株没有明显的自然起源并立即在许多人心中引发了对其被改造的质疑。”这引起了我的注意因为当时的情况似乎太熟悉了——a一种新的、不寻常的、致命的疾病突然莫名其妙地爆发,(b在分散但集中的地点,(c没有人寻找起源,(d声称该病毒主要是特定种族的主要影响非洲人以及e世界卫生组织再次全员到场。几位医生写了一篇题为没有一种自然疾病叫埃博拉的文章华尔街日报》发表了一篇有趣的文章题为科学家在丛林病毒背后寻找人类之手 [23]


I managed to locate some records of the WHO’s vaccination programs for the countries in Africa where this Ebola virus erupted, and was not surprised to learn of the correlation with WHO inoculations since there has been a good correlation with other similar incidents to date. [24]

设法找到了世界卫生组织为埃博拉病毒爆发的非洲国家的疫苗接种计划的一些记录,得知与世界卫生组织疫苗接种的相关性并不感到惊讶,因为迄今为止与其他类似事件有很好的相关性。 [24]

Dr Cyril E. Broderick points an accusing finger at the United States for the outbreak of Ebola. The sprawling haemorrhagic virus has killed close to 3,000 and infected close to 6,000 in West Africa since March this year. The countries seriously affected are Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Nigeria, DR Congo and Senegal. He says Ebola, a genetically modified organism (GMO), is a biological weapon of mass destruction, just like AIDS. Source



Dr. Cyril Brodericka former Liberian professor of plant pathology on tenure at Delaware University in the US, wrote an article claiming that the Ebola virus raging in western Africa was a GMO, made in a lab by western pharmaceutical companies and administered to unsuspecting civilians through UN vaccination programs. Of course, the Washington Post called it a “wild conspiracy theory”, but there was a basis to his claims. Organizations implicated were the WHOMédecins sans frontiersUNICEF, the US CDC and NIH, and USAMRIID. Links to the L’Oréal group, owned by The Rothschilds, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were also implicated. [25] According to Dr. Broderick, Fort Detrick was known as “the EBOLA building” over thirty years ago, and went so far as to claim there is sufficient evidence and clearly “the need to pursue criminal and civil redress for damages”, against the US government, Tulane University, the WHO, and at least one pharma company.

前利比里亚植物病理学教授Cyril Broderick博士在美国特拉华大学任职,他写了一篇文章,声称在西非肆虐的埃博拉病毒是一种转基因病毒,由西方制药公司在实验室制造,并通过联合国疫苗接种计划给毫无戒心的平民服用。当然华盛顿邮报》称之为疯狂的阴谋论但他的说法是有根据的。相关组织包括世界卫生组织、无国界医生组织、联合国儿童基金会、美国疾病预防控制中心和美国国立卫生研究院以及USAMRIID。与罗斯柴尔德家族旗下的欧莱雅集团和比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的联系也受到牵连。[25] 根据布罗德里克博士说法,德特里克堡30多年前就被称“EBOLA大楼甚至声称有足够的证据,而且显然有必要对美国政府、杜兰大学、世界卫生组织和至少一家制药公司进行刑事和民事赔偿



Dr. Broderick’s claims are solidly backed up by Yoichi Shimatsu, a Thailand-based science writer who pointed out that the Ebola outbreak coincided exactly with UN vaccination programs in West Africa, and he named some very high-profile players. He said the reason for suspecting a vaccine campaign rather than an individual carrier is due to the fact that the EBOLA contagion did not start at a single geographic center and then spread outward along the roads. Instead, simultaneous outbreaks of multiple cases occurred in widely separated parts of rural Guinea. Shimatsu noted what he calls “the strange coincidence of the earliest breakout in Guinea with major vaccine campaigns conducted by the WHO and UNICEF. [These involved] a cholera oral vaccine effort by Médecins Sans Frontières under the WHO, and UNICEF-funded prevention programs against meningitis and polio.” Shimatsu wrote, “How one of the deadliest viral strains in human history could have jumped a distance of 4,000 kilometers undetected from Central to West Africa defies logic”, and I would certainly have to agree with his assessment. [26] [27] I covered the EBOLA outbreak in some detail here. [28]

Broderick博士的说法得到了泰国科学作家Yoichi Shimatsu的有力支持,他指出埃博拉疫情正好与联合国在西非的疫苗接种计划相吻合并列举了一些非常知名的参与者。他说,怀疑疫苗运动而不是单个携带者的原因是,埃博拉病毒的传染不是从一个地理中心开始的,然后沿着道路向外传播。相反,多个病例同时爆发在几内亚农村相距甚远的地区。岛津指出,他所说的“几内亚最早爆发疫情与世界卫生组织和联合国儿童基金会开展的重大疫苗接种活动奇怪地巧合。(这些活动包括)世界卫生组织领导下的无国界医生组织的霍乱口服疫苗接种工作,以及联合国儿童卫生组织资助的脑膜炎和脊髓灰质炎预防计划。”岛津写道,类历史上最致命的病毒株之一如何在未被发现的情况下从中非跳到西非4000公里这是不合逻辑的,我当然同意他的评估。[26] [27] 我在这里详细介绍了埃博拉疫情。 [28]


Anthony Lake was National Security Advisor to President Bill Clinton responsible for US military interventions, including: the Bosnia-Herzegovina war against the Yugoslav federation; the Battle of Mogadishu in Somalia better known as “Blackhawk Down”; and Operation Uphold Democracy in Haiti. An ardent Zionist converted to Judaism, he is the perfect boss to dispense risky vaccines in Muslim-majority Guinea. Source



The items above are by no means the only circumstances where the WHO has conducted a vaccination campaign that was immediately followed by a pathogen outbreak. The participants appear many: inevitably, there is a Rothschild-owned pharma or vaccine company, and Bill Gates and his FoundationThe WHO is always in attendance, as are (usually) UNICEFthe UNFPA, the UNDP, the World Bank, the ubiquitous Rockefeller Foundation, the US NIH and often the CDC as well, the Doctors Without Borders, and a few others. The Government of Norway was also a partner in the WHO’s sterilisation travesty, contributing more than $40 million to develop the Tetanus-abortion vaccine.

上述项目绝不是世界卫生组织开展疫苗接种活动后立即爆发病原体的唯一情况。参与者似乎很多:不可避免地,有一家罗斯柴尔德旗下的制药或疫苗公司,还有·盖茨和他的基金会。世界卫生组织总是出席,联合国儿童基金会、联合国人口基金、联合国开发计划署、世界银行、无处不在的洛克菲勒基金会、美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和疾病预防控制中心(CDC)、无国界医生组织(Doctors Without Borders)以及其他一些组织也经常出席。挪威政府也是世界卫生组织绝育闹剧的合作伙伴为开发破伤风疫苗捐款4000多万美元。

5.5. 中国实验?– 5.5. A Chinese “Experiment”?


Dr Bernhard Schwartländer. Source



The WHO is also becoming active in China with alarming potential for disaster. As one example, in late 2013, a number of newborn Chinese babies died immediately after being inoculated by the WHO against hepatitis B. The WHO China representative, Dr. Bernhard Schwartlander, called China’s program “very successful”, but I find myself with knawing suspicions about his definition of ‘success’. The infant deaths may indeed have been an unfortunate accident, but I was not encouraged by Schwartlander’s comment that it is “difficult to establish a causal link between the vaccines and the babies’ deaths”. Knowing the past history of the WHO and their infectious inoculations, the ‘difficulty of establishing a causal link between the WHO vaccinations and civilian deaths’may have been the part that was ‘successful’.

世界卫生组织也在中国变得活跃起来,有着令人担忧的灾难可能性。例如,2013年末,一些中国新生儿在接种世界卫生组织乙型肝炎疫苗后立即死亡。Bernhard Schwartlander称中国的项目非常成功,但我发现自己对他对“成功”的定义充满了怀疑。婴儿的死亡可能确实是一场不幸的事故,但我并没有被Schwartlander评论所鼓舞他说难在疫苗和婴儿的死亡之间建立因果关系了解世界卫生组织及其传染病疫苗接种的过去历史,在世界卫生组织疫苗接种与平民死亡之间建立因果关系的困难可能是成功的部分。

5.6. 回到人口减少 — 5.6. Back to Depopulation


In 2016, doctors in Kenya accused the WHO and Bill Gates of secretly trying to sterilise millions of women in Africa via a tetanus vaccine program. Source



Specifically on the sterilisation vaccine, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has been heavily funding the distribution of tetanus birth-control vaccine in Africa by UNICEF, which is the agency that provided Kenya with the vaccine laced with hCG. Gates said: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps ten or fifteen percent.” The only way to interpret those words is through the anti-fertility vaccinations. And yes, Bill Gates really did say that, although there must be 25 or 30 websites now “fact-checking” this and claiming he was either taken out of context or that the videos have been “doctored or manipulated”. But I have seen the original video, and yes Bill Gates did say precisely that. The Rockefeller Foundation also heavily funded this vaccine research and distribution. [29] All this amounts to genocide on a planetary scale.



5.7. 成功的种族灭绝 — 5.7. A Successful Genocide


Men in name only: New study shows testosterone levels in American males are dropping dramatically. Why would that be? Source



In April of 2023, the WHO released a comprehensive study which stated that around one in six people worldwide are unable to conceive, around 18% of the global population. [30] A landmark study found that male sperm counts have fallen by 62% in the last 50 yearsfrom 104 to 49 million per milliliter, more or less at the threshold of complete infertility.



Given all of this effort worldwide, and the plethora of contaminated vaccines produced in the US (including one that contaminated around 100 million Americans with a cancerous simian virus), it is hardly a surprise that the WHO published a report that “reveals staggering infertility statistics”. The Atlantic Magazine followed with an article titled “Sperm Counts Continue to Fall“, [31] and one by Science Direct [32] and an op-ed by RT titled “Men in name only“. [33]


5.8. 还有更多……5.8. And Yet More . . .


There are many other strange things about the WHO. Yoichi Shimatsu pointed out that “the WHO sponsors the secretive International Vaccine Institute (IVI) in Seoul, which is headed by a US military officer named Jerome Kim who was formerly the head of the Molecular Virology and Pathogenesis Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Rockville, Maryland, and that sitting on the Board of Directors of this WHO-IVI chimera is a Dr. Claudio Lanata, the science director of the US Naval “Medical Research Unit 6” (NAMRU-6) in Callao, Peru, which is a leading military center for bioweapons research.” If you are at all familiar with the MERS outbreak in South Korea, Shimatsu theorised that it may have been caused by a laboratory accident at the JUPITR biowarfare project which, given the odd behavior of the WHO, is quite likely. [34] [35]

世界卫生组织还有许多其他奇怪的事情。岛津洋一指出,“世界卫生组织赞助了秘密的际疫苗研究所IVI在首由一位名叫Jerome Kim的美国军官领导他曾是马里兰州洛克维尔沃尔特·里德陆军研究所分子病毒学和发病机制部门的负责人,该who-IV嵌合物的董事会成员是一位博士。Claudio Lanata位于秘鲁卡劳的美国海军“第六单元医学研究”NAMRU-6的科学主任,该中心是领先的生物武器研究军事中心如果你熟悉韩国MERS的爆发,岛津认为这可能是由JUPITR生物战项目的实验室事故引起的,考虑到世界卫生组织的奇怪行为,这很有可能。 [34] [35]


New facts about the World Health Organisation that have destroyed trust. Source



Oddly, the WHO appeared quite unconcerned about this new potential epidemic, specifically stating it did not recommend the screening of passengers to or from Korea, and that no travel restrictions should be imposed. The WHO’s Director-General, Margaret Chan, said she believed South Korea could control the spread of the disease without these restrictions. One would have thought that with the worldwide panic still fresh in everyone’s mind from the SARS experience only a few years prior, they would have taken a more cautious approach. But then the WHO wasn’t entirely cautious during the SARS outbreak either; in Hong Kong, Margaret Chan specifically advised against taking many precautions, including screenings, isolations and quarantines, all advice that was later much resented because those precautions would have spared many lives. In fact, it was Margaret Chan’s curious combination of aloofness and what appeared to be outright incompetence and dishonesty that resulted in two politicians resigning and Chan leaving Hong Kong in disgrace, only to come to rest as head of the WHO.



But then only three days after a report stating no precautions should be taken, a team of WHO “experts” surprisingly stated that “The deadly MERS outbreak in South Korea” was “large and complex”, and that “more cases should be anticipated”. And in fact the disease had been spreading at an increasingly rapid pace, with 150 confirmed infections in less than one month. At the time, it really seemed that the MERS outbreak did occur from an escape at the US biological weapons lab but that the WHO assumed the immediate quarantine of the military base would corral it, and thus their assurance that no restrictions were necessary. But then, it leaked, and hence the later “deadly MERS outbreak” warning that urged multiple restrictions of all kinds.



It was similar with SARS, where Margaret Chan and the WHO took a very strange stance, as if they expected the virus to just disappear. I would remind you that SARS, although apparently intended for the Han Chinese in the mainland – and SARS was definitely a Chinese-specific virus, infecting almost no one else, it ended by being a Hong Kong epidemic. The virus was released on the Mainland in Guangzhou, but the patient zero, unwittingly but immediately, traveled to Hong Kong, sparing the Mainland but giving Hong Kong an experience to remember. [36] Still, Margaret Chan behaved as if SARS would quickly die in HK but continue to ravage the Mainland. I see no other way to interpret her strange behavior, which would indicate the WHO knew a lot more about SARS than they were telling us.

这与SARS类似,陈冯富珍和世界卫生组织采取了非常奇怪的立场,好像他们预计病毒会消失。我想提醒你尽管SARS显然是针对大陆的汉族人的——而且SARS肯定是一种中国特有的病毒几乎不会感染其他人但它最终成为香港的流行病。病毒在广州在大陆释放,但零号患者在不知不觉中立即前往香港,避开了大陆,但给了香港一段值得回忆的经历[36] 尽管如此,陈冯富珍表现得好像非典型肺炎会在香港迅速死亡,但会继续肆虐大陆。我看不出其他方式来解释她的奇怪行为,这表明世界卫生组织对SARS的了解比他们告诉我们的要多得多


There was something else very strange, from the outbreak of swine flu in the US – the epidemic that wasn’t. For that event, the WHO changed its definition of a “pandemic” as soon as the first cases were reported, greatly alarming the scientific community. Prior to this, a pandemic was an event that would be expected to have “severe” consequences on a population, but now it encompassed a pathogen with “relatively mild symptoms”, and the WHO also lowered the threshold for the declaration of a pandemic. Whatever the intention, the primary result was a financial windfall for the pharmaceutical industry, since vaccines would be mandatory. In the event, billions were spent on a largely-useless vaccine for a non-existent pandemic, and which vaccines appeared to kill as many victims as did the virus itself. It wasn’t a secret at the time, that the membership list of the WHO’s 16-member “Emergency Committee”, instrumental in changing the definitions and then declaring the pandemic, remained secret – a lack of transparency strongly attacked by almost everyone. Since then, the information available indicates that the majority of these members have a vested interest in the pharmaceutical industry.



5.9. 结语 —5.9. Epilogue


As shocking as the accusation might seem, there appears to be no shortage of claims (and evidence) from multiple informed and independent sources that the WHO has two primary functions, the first as a tool for world population reduction on behalf of its masters in The City of London, and the second as a powerful marketing agent for big pharma, specifically the vaccine manufacturers (owned by the same people). Many critics have pointed out that the ‘vaccination experts’ at the WHO are “dominated by the vaccine makers standing to gain from the enormously lucrative vaccine and antiviral contracts awarded by governments.” And indeed, the advisory and other committees involved with the WHO’s vaccine programs seem heavily populated with those who profit directly from those same programs.



Equally, the claims and concerns about population control and reduction are far from conspiracy theories today, with far too much evidence, some of it frightening, that this is indeed a major agenda of the WHO today. We have already seen too much hard evidence of this body’s involvement in both areas to justify dismissing the concerns as implausible fears. Moreover, there is a disturbing list of individuals closely associated with the WHO, who have had either population reduction or mass vaccinations as a pet project.



It is difficult, on the basis of all the evidence, to avoid the conclusion that the WHO is an international criminal enterprise under the control of a core group of European Khazars in The City of London at its center which, as one writer noted, “provides the strategic leadership and funds the development, manufacturing and release of synthetic, man-made viruses solely to justify immensely profitable mass vaccinations”. We have seen so many instances of an unusual and apparently laboratory-made virus appearing without warning, the onset followed immediately by urgent worried pronouncements from the WHO of yet another mandatory mass vaccination.



We have the rampant production of viruses in secretive labs around the world, and the repeated “accidental” release of those into various populations (think ZIKA) – seemingly inevitably without explanation, apology, or even a semblance of actual investigation, much less censure or criminal or civil charges. We also have the blanket legal immunity for all pharma companies in their creation and dissemination of deadly pathogens by vaccination. When we add into this mix the WHO’s history of criminality as with their now-famous tetanus/hCG international sterility program (the subject of this essay), the curious timing of the onset of AIDS, the release of SARS, MERS, and EBOLA, and the many occurrences of the WHO’s vaccination programs perfectly coinciding with a sudden outbreak of yet another unusual disease in the same areas and populationsone would have to be a hard-core ideologue to not become damned suspicious.



And finally, we have a Croatian MP who says that the WHO Should Be Declared a Terrorist Organization: “Worse Than the WEF”. [37] His comments: “I would like to briefly make the people aware of the upcoming danger for humanity,” said Kolakusic. “The World Health Organization wants all countries to sign an agreement on handing over the authority to declare a pandemic, procure vaccines, and drugs. It will be healthier and safer for humanity to sign an agreement with the Colombian drug cartel. They know all about drugs for sure.”



There is much more to this story. You may care to read a companion piece titled, “The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth”, to learn the origin and vast reach of this enterprise. [38]




Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).



His full archive can be seen at

他的完整文章库可以在以下看到  +


He can be contacted at:




[1] Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug. International / developing countries

[1] 破伤风疫苗可能含有抗生育药物。国际/发展中国家

[2] HCG found in WHO tetanus vaccine in Kenya

[2] 肯尼亚世界卫生组织破伤风疫苗中发现HCG

[3] Vaccines and Population Control: A Hidden Agenda

[3] 疫苗和人口控制:一个隐藏的议程

[4] Canada’s Tainted Blood

[4] 加拿大的受污染血液

[5] The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities

[5] 世界卫生组织生育调节疫苗工作队。其形成、目标和研究活动

[6] Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid

[6] 候选抗妊娠疫苗的抗原性和临床效果的观察:与破伤风类毒素连接的人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基



[8] A vaccine that prevents pregnancy in women




[10] Anti-hCG vaccines are in clinical trials


[11] Anti-hCG vaccines are in clinical trials

The available data suggest that the vaccine prevents pregnancy above antibody titres of 50 ng/ml hCG bioneutralization capacity. completed Phase I clinical trials, indicating the reversibility and safety of these vaccines.

[12] Advances in development of a contraceptive vaccine against human chorionic gonadotropin

[12] 抗人绒毛膜促性腺激素避孕疫苗的研发进展

[13] Clin. exp. Immunol. [1978] 33, (360-375); February 8, 1978

[13] 《临床实验免疫学》[1978] 33, (360-375); 1978年2月8日

[14] Vatican: UNICEF and WHO are sterilizing girls through vaccines

[14] 梵蒂冈:联合国儿童基金会和世界卫生组织正在通过疫苗对女孩进行绝育

[15] Fertility-Regulating Vaccines are Being Tested in India;


[16] Fertility-Regulating Vaccines are Being Tested in India;


[17] More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus


[18] Secret report surfaces showing that Pfizer was at fault in Nigerian drug tests
[18] 秘密报告显示辉瑞公司在尼日利亚药物测试中存在过错

[19] Origins of Vaccine Hesitancy: The 1996 Pfizer Drug Trials in Nigeria

[19] 疫苗犹豫的起源:1996 年辉瑞公司在尼日利亚进行的药物试验

[20] Pfizer pays out to Nigerian families of meningitis drug trial victims

[20] 辉瑞公司向脑膜炎药物试验受害者的尼日利亚家庭支付赔偿金

[21] Nigerian Families Sue Pfizer


[22] In this Nigerian city, Pfizer fears loom over the vaccine rollout


[23] Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus

[23] 科学家寻找丛林病毒背后的人类之手

[24] The Ebola Breakout Coincided With UN Vaccine Campaigns

[24] 埃博拉爆发与联合国疫苗接种活动同时发生

[25] Ebola Made by Pharma & DOD, Injected by UN – Dr. Broderick

[25] 制药公司和国防部制造的埃博拉病毒,由联合国注射 – 布罗德里克博士

[26] The Ebola Breakout Coincided With UN Vaccine Campaigns

[26] 埃博拉爆发与联合国疫苗接种活动同时发生

[27] Rebirth of Empire & The American Role: The Global Biowarfare and Ebola Serum

[27] 帝国的重生和美国的作用:全球生物战和埃博拉血清

[28] EBOLA


[29] Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO


[30] WHO reveals ‘staggering’ infertility statistics


[31] Sperm Counts Continue to Fall


[32] A study from Jauary 2020: Trends in Serum Testosterone Levels Among Adolescent and Young Adult Men in the US

[32] 2020 年 1 月的一项研究:美国青少年和年轻男性血清睾酮水平趋势

[33] Men in name only: New study shows testosterone levels in American males are dropping dramatically. Why would that be?


[34] South Korea MERS Emerged Out Of The Pentagon’s Biowarfare Labs


[35] MERS


[36] SARS

[36] 非典

[37] Croatian MP Says the WHO Should Be Declared a Terrorist Organization: ‘Worse Than the WEF’


[38] The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth

[38] 地球人口减少的乐趣


This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.


Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2023

权所有 © 拉里·罗曼诺夫、上海蓝月亮、上海月亮,2023