We tend to think of biological and/or chemical warfare in simple terms within a simple framework, which tendency leads us to misunderstand much of what happens around us and to mis-categorise many world events. Usually, when contemplating this subject, we imagine the use of these agents in times of war (hot or cold), perhaps picturing armies using mustard gas or the US spraying Agent Orange over most of Vietnam. Or perhaps we picture the US inflicting biological pathogens in North Korea (as it did), or dispersing swine flu in Cuba and China (as it also did). In any case, we normally imagine these events to involve one nation acting against another.
But biological warfare acts in many guises and has many objectives. It also has many categories of perpetrators as well as classifications of intended victims. Biological warfare has long since passed from the military world into the civilian one, a fact that will require experience and contemplation to fully appreciate. The main actor may be a state government, but it can also be an institution, a corporation, or a UN agency. It could also be a conspiratorial group of individuals with a political agenda, and it is not always easy to identify the ultimate sources, nor for whom they are ultimately acting.
If you have read Volume One of my E-book on ‘America’s Dirtiest Secrets’, you will have learned that the US government and military conducted biological and chemical “experiments” on the American population, experiments so vast they covered many decades, affected tens or even hundreds of millions of victims, and on occasion were so comprehensive they covered the entire continental United States and parts of Canada. The intention was not to kill the population of an enemy nation, but to learn the potential of biological pathogens and the best means of distribution. In these cases of thousands of experiments spanning many decades, the intended victims were the government’s own people, but this still counts as biological warfare. Similarly, when the US military subjected its soldiers to various pathogens and vaccines, these were biological experiments designed to learn how to best infect and disable an enemy’s military. Even though the intention was not to kill one’s own servicemen, this still counts as biological warfare.
More than six million pigs, cattle and sheep were slaughtered across 10,000 UK farms in the 2001 outbreak.
Photograph: Murdo Macleod/the Guardian
Turning to another direction, when a group of financiers and industrialists conspire to kill off the domestic animal herds or flocks so that Big Agra can eliminate small farmers and take control of a nation’s food supply, as they almost certainly did in the UK, this also classifies as biological warfare even though the targets in this case are animals.
Vaccinations are another example. As you may already know, the UN’s WHO concocted a “sterility vaccine” utilising the human female hormone Hcg combined with tetanus toxoid as a carrier and, in Third-World countries, sterilised about 150 million women without their knowledge, under the guise of conducting tetanus vaccinations. Also, there are quite a few instances where it appears almost certain that a major pharmaceutical company arranged for a disease outbreak in a poor country – with the kind assistance of the WHO’s ubiquitous vaccination programs – to save the cost of live trials of a new experimental medication.These are also classified as biological warfare, in this case by a UN agency and a big pharma company against the poor people of the world.
Estimating risks of importation and local transmission of Zika virus infection.
There are other categories too. Sometimes pathogens can be released which are harmless in themselves but can be used to create fear which can then be applied to remake a nation’s social policies. As one example, it is obvious to intelligent observers that the ZIKA virus was deliberately dispersed to create sufficient fear among the involved populations to force national governments to relax their policies on abortion.One circumstantial proof is that ZIKA emerged only in Central and South America, areas which are heavily Christian and which had the most restrictive abortion policies. ZIKA had a choice of appearing anywhere in the world, and could certainly have chosen a victim closer to home, instead of traveling 15,000 Kms, from Micronesia to Brazil. The evidence in this case points quite strongly to the perpetrators being the Khazar Jews in The City of London, with unusual ideas about the future of our world, and with the financial and political power to carry through their ambitions.
There is yet another aspect to this: GM seed. It is by now well-known that various companies and governments have succeeded in splicing a large number of different pathogens into GM seed. This can be benign, when one firm attempted to create plants that could produce aspirin. It can also be malignant, as when another firm produced spermicidal corn that would render men sterile. In fact, it has been proven that a great many deadly pathogens can be spliced into GM seed, with consequences I will leave to your imagination. But GM seed itself can be rendered infertile, sentencing an unwitting nation to a devastating drop in food production and resulting genocide by famine. In all its forms, GM seed qualifies as biological warfare, at least potentially.
Similarly, seed and bio-chemical companies were in the recent past suddenly promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is an effective male sterilant. The seed companies claimed to have removed this toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food)will render an entire male population sterile. This also qualifies as biological warfare, in this case by Western governments and UN agencies against the population of the entire Third World.
One conviction you should carry in your heart is that there are no “accidents” in major domestic events and in foreign affairs, that when something major occurs, other than volcanoes and tornadoes, you can be certain that event was planned. We may not always know who planned it, but we can be assured it was not fortuitous or what we might call “An act of God”. I can think of only one exception to this rule in the past 100 or more years, which I will discuss later.
Again, if you have read Volume One of the above-mentioned E-book series, you will have seen that the US government – and all the mass media – lied to the people for more than 70 years, exemplified by Eisenhower subjecting families to massive doses of nuclear radiation and instructing the media to tell women suffering miscarriages, hair loss and cancers, that they were suffering from “housewife syndrome”.
Defending the Anglosphere:former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, US President Dwight D. Eisenhower and British PM Harold Macmillan at a reunion with former generals in London in 1959.
If one Western government will inflict such atrocities on their own populationand offer rigorous denials and outrageous lies for decades, why would you imagine other Western governments to be different? Why would you imagine multi-national corporations or UN agencies to be different? They all source their staff from the same cesspool. Are we to believe that the member countries of the UN always lie, but the UN always tells the truth? That situation could not exist: the UN is made up of representatives from these same nations, and is in no sense independent of them.
At this early December 2010 summit in Kazakhstan, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (center left) expressed her regrets to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon (far left) for the leaked disclosures regarding US diplomats spying on the UN.
As you read through the examples discussed in this series, keep these cautions in mind and it should become increasingly clear that many past biological events we dismissed as accidents were in fact carefully planned and with a very definite purpose. And as you review in your mind the “official narrative” from governments and the media on these events, it should become increasingly clear to you that the official stories cannot possibly be true, any more than can the US State Department’s denials of Hillary Clinton’s UN spying.
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
This document may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.